PortfoliosLab logo
CNDX.AS vs. QQQM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CNDX.AS and QQQM is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CNDX.AS:

0.38

QQQM:

0.58

Sortino Ratio

CNDX.AS:

0.73

QQQM:

1.00

Omega Ratio

CNDX.AS:

1.10

QQQM:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

CNDX.AS:

0.38

QQQM:

0.67

Martin Ratio

CNDX.AS:

1.08

QQQM:

2.17

Ulcer Index

CNDX.AS:

9.20%

QQQM:

7.00%

Daily Std Dev

CNDX.AS:

22.97%

QQQM:

25.35%

Max Drawdown

CNDX.AS:

-31.21%

QQQM:

-35.05%

Current Drawdown

CNDX.AS:

-11.47%

QQQM:

-3.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNDX.AS achieves a -7.84% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 2.14% return.


CNDX.AS

YTD

-7.84%

1M

11.21%

6M

-5.47%

1Y

8.74%

3Y*

17.47%

5Y*

17.44%

10Y*

17.01%

QQQM

YTD

2.14%

1M

10.31%

6M

2.69%

1Y

14.57%

3Y*

19.92%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNDX.AS has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNDX.AS vs. QQQM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNDX.AS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNDX.AS is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNDX.AS is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNDX.AS is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNDX.AS is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNDX.AS is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNDX.AS is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQM is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQM is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQM is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQM is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQM is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQM is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CNDX.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNDX.AS and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

CNDX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.


TTM20242023202220212020
CNDX.AS
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.58%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%

Drawdowns

CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNDX.AS drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDX.AS and QQQM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) has a higher volatility of 7.05% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 5.52%. This indicates that CNDX.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...