CNDX.AS vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CNDX.AS (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from iShares and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNDX.AS returned 18.85%/yr vs 19.18%/yr for QQQM. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNDX.AS charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CNDX.AS is traded in EUR, while QQQM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CNDX.AS having a 21.89% return and QQQM slightly higher at 22.88%.

CNDX.AS

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 11.52%
• YTD: 21.89%
• 6M: 20.33%
• 1Y: 38.95%
• 3Y*: 25.16%
• 5Y*: 18.85%
• 10Y*: 21.38%

QQQM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 11.49%
• YTD: 22.88%
• 6M: 20.44%
• 1Y: 39.19%
• 3Y*: 25.48%
• 5Y*: 19.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CNDX.AS iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF	21.89%	6.16%	35.29%	50.41%	-29.90%	38.80%	1.06%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	22.85%	6.51%	33.98%	50.36%	-28.34%	36.98%	2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CNDX.AS and QQQM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020	0.63

The correlation between CNDX.AS and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CNDX.AS vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNDX.AS

CNDX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 71
CNDX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
CNDX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CNDX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 73
CNDX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
CNDX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 62

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CNDX.AS	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	2.44	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	3.10	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.43	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.82	3.58	+0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.35	11.22	+0.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNDX.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNDX.AS and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNDX.AS	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	2.44	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	0.88	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	0.87	+0.16

Drawdowns

CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNDX.AS drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQM drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDX.AS and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNDX.AS	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.21%	-30.95%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.06%	-10.99%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.57%	-27.16%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.21%	-30.95%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.45%	-7.34%	+1.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	3.50%	-0.10%

Volatility

CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 3.68%. This indicates that CNDX.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNDX.AS	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.25%	3.68%	+0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.70%	11.45%	-0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.52%	16.16%	-0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.73%	21.90%	-2.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.61%	21.72%	-2.11%

CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNDX.AS has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

CNDX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CNDX.AS iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.41%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNDX.AS and QQQM in my portfolio?

CNDX.AS and QQQM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CNDX.AS or QQQM?

On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNDX.AS or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for CNDX.AS.

What is the main difference between CNDX.AS and QQQM?

Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for CNDX.AS and 0.15% for QQQM.