CNDX.AS vs. QQQM
CNDX.AS (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from iShares and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNDX.AS returned 15.20%/yr vs 15.53%/yr for QQQM. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNDX.AS charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CNDX.AS is traded in EUR, while QQQM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNDX.AS achieves a 15.14% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 16.89% return.
CNDX.AS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- 6M
- 15.64%
- YTD
- 15.14%
- 1Y
- 26.56%
- 3Y*
- 21.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.20%
- 10Y*
- 19.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.57%
QQQM
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- 6M
- 14.17%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 26.92%
- 3Y*
- 22.56%
- 5Y*
- 15.53%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.42%
CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.AS iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 15.14% | 6.57% | 35.29% | 50.41% | -29.90% | 38.80% | 2.87% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 16.89% | 6.51% | 33.98% | 50.36% | -28.34% | 36.98% | 2.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNDX.AS and QQQM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020 | 0.63 |
The correlation between CNDX.AS and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNDX.AS vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
CNDX.AS
QQQM
CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNDX.AS | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.26 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 2.46 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.66 | 7.35 | +0.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNDX.AS drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQM drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDX.AS and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNDX.AS | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -30.95% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.06% | -10.99% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.57% | -27.16% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.21% | -30.95% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.66% | -5.61% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | -7.24% | +1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 3.67% | -0.16% |
Volatility
CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) is 6.18%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 6.95%. This indicates that CNDX.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNDX.AS | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 6.95% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 14.30% | -1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 18.37% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.02% | 22.24% | -2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 21.85% | -2.09% |
CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNDX.AS has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNDX.AS vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
CNDX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDX.AS iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNDX.AS and QQQM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for CNDX.AS.
Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for CNDX.AS and 0.15% for QQQM.
Find the right allocation for CNDX.AS and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer