PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNDU.TO vs. SOXU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNDU.TO vs. SOXU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) and MegaLong (3X) US Semiconductors Daily Leveraged Alternative ETF (SOXU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNDU.TO achieves a 17.93% return, which is significantly lower than SOXU.TO's 538.96% return.


CNDU.TO

1D
-1.69%
1M
6.67%
YTD
17.93%
6M
21.59%
1Y
62.18%
3Y*
38.91%
5Y*
22.02%
10Y*
18.70%

SOXU.TO

1D
5.63%
1M
123.65%
YTD
538.96%
6M
517.85%
1Y
1,567.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNDU.TO vs. SOXU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CNDU.TO and SOXU.TO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNDU.TO vs. SOXU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNDU.TO
CNDU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CNDU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXU.TO
SOXU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
SOXU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNDU.TO vs. SOXU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) and MegaLong (3X) US Semiconductors Daily Leveraged Alternative ETF (SOXU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNDU.TOSOXU.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.65

15.58

-12.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.27

5.37

-2.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.75

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

37.08

-32.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.17

124.73

-106.56

CNDU.TO vs. SOXU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNDU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is lower than the SOXU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 15.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNDU.TO and SOXU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNDU.TOSOXU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

15.58

-12.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

14.98

-14.70

Drawdowns

CNDU.TO vs. SOXU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -78.08%, which is greater than SOXU.TO's maximum drawdown of -42.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDU.TO and SOXU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNDU.TOSOXU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.08%

-42.78%

-35.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.26%

-42.78%

+27.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

0.00%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.36%

-8.28%

-15.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

12.69%

-9.26%

Volatility

CNDU.TO vs. SOXU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) is 6.36%, while MegaLong (3X) US Semiconductors Daily Leveraged Alternative ETF (SOXU.TO) has a volatility of 40.22%. This indicates that CNDU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNDU.TOSOXU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

40.22%

-33.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.86%

81.21%

-62.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.58%

101.81%

-78.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.54%

101.21%

-75.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.10%

101.21%

-71.11%

CNDU.TO vs. SOXU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNDU.TO has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXU.TO's 1.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNDU.TO vs. SOXU.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CNDU.TO nor SOXU.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CNDU.TO and SOXU.TO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CNDU.TO is cheaper at 1.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CNDU.TO is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.81% for SOXU.TO.

CNDU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while SOXU.TO tracks Solactive US Semiconductor 30 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Horizons ETFs and LongPoint. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for CNDU.TO and 1.81% for SOXU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNDU.TO and SOXU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer