CNDU.TO vs. FCCM.NEO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CNDU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF) and FCCM.NEO (Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNDU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index, while FCCM.NEO is a Momentum fund tracking the Fidelity Canada Canadian Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNDU.TO returned 22.64%/yr vs 19.08%/yr for FCCM.NEO. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNDU.TO charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FCCM.NEO.

Performance

CNDU.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) and Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF (FCCM.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNDU.TO achieves a 20.99% return, which is significantly higher than FCCM.NEO's 11.11% return.

CNDU.TO

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: 9.97%
• YTD: 20.99%
• 6M: 22.18%
• 1Y: 67.87%
• 3Y*: 40.60%
• 5Y*: 22.64%
• 10Y*: 18.95%

FCCM.NEO

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: 3.24%
• YTD: 11.11%
• 6M: 12.84%
• 1Y: 44.14%
• 3Y*: 29.52%
• 5Y*: 19.08%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNDU.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CNDU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF	20.99%	54.27%	34.82%	15.07%	-17.75%	59.15%	26.82%
FCCM.NEO Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF	11.11%	43.17%	27.03%	10.10%	-3.42%	14.23%	9.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CNDU.TO and FCCM.NEO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2020	0.58

Over the past year, CNDU.TO and FCCM.NEO have become more correlated (0.81) than their long-term average of 0.58, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

CNDU.TO vs. FCCM.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNDU.TO

CNDU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 84
CNDU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CNDU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
CNDU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
CNDU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
CNDU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FCCM.NEO

FCCM.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 82
FCCM.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FCCM.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FCCM.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FCCM.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FCCM.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNDU.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) and Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF (FCCM.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CNDU.TO	FCCM.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	2.85	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	3.66	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.52	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.47	3.59	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.83	15.61	+4.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CNDU.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNDU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the FCCM.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNDU.TO and FCCM.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNDU.TO	FCCM.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88	2.85	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	1.42	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	1.34	-1.06

Drawdowns

CNDU.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -78.08%, which is greater than FCCM.NEO's maximum drawdown of -16.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDU.TO and FCCM.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNDU.TO	FCCM.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.08%	-16.59%	-61.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.26%	-12.36%	-2.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.52%	-12.36%	-12.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.60%	-16.59%	-16.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.19%	+1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.35%	-2.60%	-20.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	2.83%	+0.60%

Volatility

CNDU.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Volatility Comparison

BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF (FCCM.NEO) at 5.20%. This indicates that CNDU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCCM.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNDU.TO	FCCM.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.68%	5.20%	+1.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.01%	12.63%	+6.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.70%	15.60%	+8.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.56%	13.47%	+12.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.10%	13.41%	+16.69%

CNDU.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNDU.TO has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FCCM.NEO's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNDU.TO vs. FCCM.NEO - Dividend Comparison

CNDU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCCM.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CNDU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FCCM.NEO Fidelity Canadian Momentum Index ETF	0.82%	0.91%	0.91%	1.32%	1.79%	1.49%	0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNDU.TO and FCCM.NEO in my portfolio?

CNDU.TO and FCCM.NEO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CNDU.TO or FCCM.NEO?

On fees, FCCM.NEO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNDU.TO or FCCM.NEO?

FCCM.NEO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CNDU.TO.

What is the main difference between CNDU.TO and FCCM.NEO?

CNDU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FCCM.NEO is Momentum. CNDU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while FCCM.NEO tracks Fidelity Canada Canadian Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Horizons ETFs and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for CNDU.TO and 0.38% for FCCM.NEO.