CNCR vs. UNHW

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) and UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNCR is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index, while UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments. CNCR is passively managed, while UNHW is actively managed. CNCR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for UNHW.

Performance

CNCR vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CNCR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UNHW

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 2.46%
• YTD: 15.01%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNCR vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	44.62%

CNCR vs. UNHW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CNCR	UNHW
Healthcare	96.6%	33.4%
Financial Services	3.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CNCR vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNCR	UNHW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.50	—

Drawdowns

CNCR vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNCR drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum UNHW drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCR and UNHW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNCR	UNHW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-32.28%	+32.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.11%	+7.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-12.53%	+12.53%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CNCR	UNHW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	50.01%	-50.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	50.01%	-50.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	50.01%	-50.01%

CNCR vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNCR vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison

CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UNHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.34%.

Position	TTM	2025
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%	0.00%
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	17.34%	2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CNCR or UNHW?

On fees, CNCR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNCR or UNHW?

CNCR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNCR or UNHW?

UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 17.34%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.

What is the main difference between CNCR and UNHW?

CNCR is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CNCR and 0.99% for UNHW.