CNCR vs. LFSC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) and LFSC (F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. CNCR is passively managed, while LFSC is actively managed. CNCR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for LFSC.

Performance

CNCR vs. LFSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CNCR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LFSC

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 11.21%
• YTD: 16.36%
• 6M: 9.80%
• 1Y: 75.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNCR vs. LFSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%
LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF	24.55%

Return for Risk

CNCR vs. LFSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNCR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LFSC

LFSC Risk / Return Rank: 85
LFSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
LFSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
LFSC Omega Ratio Rank: 83
LFSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
LFSC Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNCR vs. LFSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR) and F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNCR	LFSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.85	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.79	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.45	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.66	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.00	—

Drawdowns

CNCR vs. LFSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNCR drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum LFSC drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNCR and LFSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNCR	LFSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-29.74%	+29.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-7.58%	+7.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.81%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CNCR	LFSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.86%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	26.56%	-26.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	28.90%	-28.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	28.90%	-28.90%

CNCR vs. LFSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LFSC's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNCR vs. LFSC - Dividend Comparison

Neither CNCR nor LFSC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CNCR or LFSC?

On fees, LFSC is cheaper at 0.54% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNCR or LFSC?

LFSC is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNCR or LFSC?

CNCR and LFSC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CNCR and LFSC?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CNCR and 0.54% for LFSC.