CNAV vs. SCHX
CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. CNAV is actively managed, while SCHX is passively managed. Over the past year, CNAV returned 60.68% vs 31.60% for SCHX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CNAV charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
CNAV vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNAV achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 2.82% return.
CNAV
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 12.62%
- YTD
- 14.08%
- 6M
- 15.20%
- 1Y
- 60.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- 31.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
CNAV vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 14.08% | 16.80% | 6.34% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 2.82% | 17.46% | 3.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNAV and SCHX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between CNAV and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNAV vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
CNAV
SCHX
CNAV vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNAV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.72 | 2.38 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.45 | 3.30 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.44 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.93 | 3.59 | +1.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.01 | 15.97 | +6.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNAV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | 2.38 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.83 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
CNAV vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNAV drawdown since its inception was -30.06%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNAV and SCHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNAV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.06% | -34.33% | +4.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.97% | -9.02% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.79% | -4.00% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.03% | +0.88% |
Volatility
CNAV vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a higher volatility of 10.89% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 5.57%. This indicates that CNAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNAV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.89% | 5.57% | +5.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.94% | 9.59% | +8.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.53% | 13.41% | +9.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.02% | 17.17% | +8.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.02% | 18.14% | +7.88% |
CNAV vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNAV has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNAV vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.08% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |