PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNAV vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNAV vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNAV achieves a 47.26% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 10.72% return.


CNAV

1D
1.11%
1M
21.60%
YTD
47.26%
6M
48.02%
1Y
72.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHX

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.06%
YTD
10.72%
6M
10.60%
1Y
27.36%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
13.29%
10Y*
15.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNAV vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CNAV
Mohr Company Nav ETF
47.26%16.80%6.34%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
10.72%17.46%3.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CNAV and SCHX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

0.79

The correlation between CNAV and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNAV vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNAV
CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNAV vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNAVSCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.41

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.63

3.05

+2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.09

13.85

+10.24

CNAV vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNAV Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNAV and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNAVSCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

2.29

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.62

0.85

+0.77

Drawdowns

CNAV vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNAV drawdown since its inception was -30.06%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNAV and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNAVSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.06%

-34.33%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.97%

-9.02%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-3.97%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

1.98%

+1.04%

Volatility

CNAV vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a higher volatility of 12.28% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 2.91%. This indicates that CNAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNAVSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.28%

2.91%

+9.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.02%

9.02%

+12.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.08%

11.99%

+13.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.16%

17.12%

+10.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.16%

18.15%

+9.01%

CNAV vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNAV has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNAV vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNAV
Mohr Company Nav ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.01%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNAV and SCHX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNAV has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to SCHX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNAV dropped -30.06% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 72.64% vs 27.36% for SCHX. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 72.64% return vs 27.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

They also come from different issuers: Mohr and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for CNAV and 0.03% for SCHX.

CNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNAV and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer