PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNAA.DE vs. XCS7.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNAA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNAA.DE achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than XCS7.DE's -6.89% return.


CNAA.DE

1D
-0.79%
1M
0.35%
YTD
9.91%
6M
11.19%
1Y
33.60%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
-0.21%
10Y*

XCS7.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
-6.89%
6M
-9.34%
1Y
2.51%
3Y*
7.69%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNAA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CNAA.DE
Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc
9.91%10.09%19.81%-17.19%1.91%
XCS7.DE
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D
-6.89%16.53%27.49%-14.73%4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CNAA.DE and XCS7.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022

0.73

The correlation between CNAA.DE and XCS7.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNAA.DE vs. XCS7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNAA.DE
CNAA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CNAA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNAA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNAA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CNAA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNAA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

XCS7.DE
XCS7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
XCS7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNAA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNAA.DEXCS7.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.04

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.08

0.16

+4.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.52

0.34

+13.18

CNAA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNAA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the XCS7.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNAA.DE and XCS7.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNAA.DEXCS7.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

0.15

+1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.20

+0.09

Drawdowns

CNAA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNAA.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.90%, which is greater than XCS7.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNAA.DE and XCS7.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNAA.DEXCS7.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.90%

-36.62%

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.65%

-17.01%

+10.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.84%

-24.53%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.33%

-14.97%

+3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-15.59%

-3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

8.18%

-5.68%

Volatility

CNAA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE) is 6.13%, while Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) has a volatility of 7.33%. This indicates that CNAA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCS7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNAA.DEXCS7.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

7.33%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.38%

13.19%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

18.48%

-1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.44%

25.65%

-4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.51%

25.65%

-3.14%

CNAA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNAA.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XCS7.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNAA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Dividend Comparison

CNAA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XCS7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%.


PositionTTM202520242023
CNAA.DE
Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCS7.DE
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D
2.11%2.35%2.05%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNAA.DE and XCS7.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCS7.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCS7.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CNAA.DE.

CNAA.DE tracks MSCI China A, while XCS7.DE tracks MSCI China. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CNAA.DE and 0.28% for XCS7.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNAA.DE and XCS7.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer