CNAA.DE vs. IQQC.DE
CNAA.DE (Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc) and IQQC.DE (iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - CNAA.DE tracks the MSCI China A while IQQC.DE tracks the FTSE China 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNAA.DE returned -0.21%/yr vs -2.24%/yr for IQQC.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNAA.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IQQC.DE.
Performance
CNAA.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNAA.DE achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than IQQC.DE's -7.00% return.
CNAA.DE
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 33.60%
- 3Y*
- 8.43%
- 5Y*
- -0.21%
- 10Y*
- —
IQQC.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -3.70%
- YTD
- -7.00%
- 6M
- -9.66%
- 1Y
- -2.21%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- -2.24%
- 10Y*
- 2.69%
CNAA.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNAA.DE Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc | 9.91% | 10.09% | 19.81% | -17.19% | -20.96% | 13.50% | 28.18% | 12.50% |
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | -7.00% | 14.32% | 39.12% | -16.33% | -13.36% | -15.34% | -1.10% | 11.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNAA.DE and IQQC.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2019 | 0.69 |
The correlation between CNAA.DE and IQQC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNAA.DE vs. IQQC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CNAA.DE
IQQC.DE
CNAA.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE) and iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNAA.DE | IQQC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.00 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.08 | -0.11 | +5.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.52 | -0.23 | +13.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNAA.DE | IQQC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | -0.09 | +2.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | -0.08 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.17 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
CNAA.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNAA.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.90%, smaller than the maximum IQQC.DE drawdown of -67.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNAA.DE and IQQC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNAA.DE | IQQC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.90% | -67.50% | +23.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.65% | -15.24% | +8.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.84% | -27.71% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.85% | -47.35% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.33% | -24.02% | +12.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.23% | -28.16% | +8.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 7.16% | -4.66% |
Volatility
CNAA.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc (CNAA.DE) is 6.13%, while iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that CNAA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNAA.DE | IQQC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.13% | 6.75% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.38% | 12.55% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.52% | 17.72% | -1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 28.20% | -6.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.51% | 25.07% | -2.56% |
CNAA.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNAA.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQC.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNAA.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Dividend Comparison
CNAA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNAA.DE Amundi MSCI China A UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | 1.92% | 1.78% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.51% | 1.85% | 2.51% | 2.45% | 3.03% | 2.38% | 2.33% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNAA.DE and IQQC.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CNAA.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CNAA.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQC.DE.
CNAA.DE tracks MSCI China A, while IQQC.DE tracks FTSE China 50. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CNAA.DE and 0.74% for IQQC.DE.
Find the right allocation for CNAA.DE and IQQC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer