PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CN vs. SHYL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CN vs. SHYL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CN

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SHYL

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.16%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.57%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
8.28%
5Y*
4.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CN vs. SHYL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%-3.10%-11.87%-23.85%-12.74%31.55%26.79%-26.25%
SHYL
Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF
1.15%7.78%8.52%11.39%-5.21%4.60%3.64%10.16%-0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between CN and SHYL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2018

0.38

The correlation between CN and SHYL shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CN vs. SHYL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CN

SHYL
SHYL Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SHYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYL Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CN vs. SHYL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CN vs. SHYL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNSHYLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

Drawdowns

CN vs. SHYL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNSHYLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

Volatility

CN vs. SHYL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNSHYLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.69%

CN vs. SHYL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SHYL's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CN vs. SHYL - Dividend Comparison

CN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.04%1.80%2.00%0.78%4.18%2.09%0.81%11.41%14.00%
SHYL
Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF
6.94%7.02%7.26%6.60%5.52%4.65%6.16%5.93%5.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CN and SHYL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SHYL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SHYL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CN.

SHYL has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

CN is categorized as China Equities, while SHYL is High Yield Bonds. CN tracks MSCI China All Shares, while SHYL tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market 0-5 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CN and 0.20% for SHYL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CN and SHYL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer