CN vs. ESHY
CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) and ESHY (Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CN is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China All Shares, while ESHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index. Both are passively managed. CN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ESHY.
Performance
CN vs. ESHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CN
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESHY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CN vs. ESHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% |
ESHY Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CN vs. ESHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CN vs. ESHY - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CN | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | 0.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
CN vs. ESHY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CN | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 0.00% | — |
CN vs. ESHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ESHY's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CN vs. ESHY - Dividend Comparison
Neither CN nor ESHY has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 0.78% | 4.18% | 2.09% | 0.81% | 11.41% | 14.00% |
ESHY Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ESHY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESHY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CN.
CN and ESHY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
CN is categorized as China Equities, while ESHY is High Yield Bonds. CN tracks MSCI China All Shares, while ESHY tracks JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CN and 0.20% for ESHY.
Find the right allocation for CN and ESHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer