PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CN vs. ESHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CN vs. ESHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CN

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ESHY

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CN vs. ESHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


CN vs. ESHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CN
ESHY

Financial Services

55.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%

-

Industrials

1.0%

-

Energy

0.9%
100.0%

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Healthcare

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

0.6%

-

Communication Services

0.4%

-

Technology

0.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.3%

-

Utilities

0.2%

-

Financial Services

CN
55.1%
ESHY

-

Consumer Cyclical

CN
5.4%
ESHY

-

Industrials

CN
1.0%
ESHY

-

Energy

CN
0.9%
ESHY
100.0%

Real Estate

CN
0.8%
ESHY

-

Healthcare

CN
0.8%
ESHY

-

Basic Materials

CN
0.6%
ESHY

-

Communication Services

CN
0.4%
ESHY

-

Technology

CN
0.3%
ESHY

-

Consumer Defensive

CN
0.3%
ESHY

-

Utilities

CN
0.2%
ESHY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CN vs. ESHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CN vs. ESHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CN vs. ESHY - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNESHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

Volatility

CN vs. ESHY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNESHYDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

CN vs. ESHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ESHY's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CN vs. ESHY - Dividend Comparison

Neither CN nor ESHY has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%4.04%1.80%2.00%0.78%4.18%2.09%0.81%11.41%14.00%
ESHY
Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, ESHY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESHY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CN.

CN and ESHY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

CN is categorized as China Equities, while ESHY is High Yield Bonds. CN tracks MSCI China All Shares, while ESHY tracks JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CN and 0.20% for ESHY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CN and ESHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer