CN vs. DRAG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) and DRAG (Roundhill China Dragons ETF) are both China Equities funds. CN is passively managed, while DRAG is actively managed. CN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for DRAG.

Performance

CN vs. DRAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRAG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CN vs. DRAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF	0.00%

CN vs. DRAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CN	DRAG
Financial Services	55.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	72.4%
Industrials	1.0%	-
Energy	0.9%	-
Real Estate	0.8%	-
Healthcare	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	0.6%	-
Communication Services	0.4%	17.3%
Technology	0.3%	10.2%
Consumer Defensive	0.3%	-
Utilities	0.2%	-

Return for Risk

CN vs. DRAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) and Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CN	DRAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	0.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CN	DRAG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	0.00%	—

CN vs. DRAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DRAG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

CN vs. DRAG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CN nor DRAG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CN or DRAG?

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CN or DRAG?

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for DRAG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CN or DRAG?

CN and DRAG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CN and DRAG?

They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CN and 0.59% for DRAG.