CMU.L vs. PRUK.L
CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) and PRUK.L (Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - CMU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while PRUK.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CMU.L returned 10.52%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for PRUK.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CMU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRUK.L.
Performance
CMU.L vs. PRUK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMU.L achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly higher than PRUK.L's 2.88% return.
CMU.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- 1Y
- 29.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
PRUK.L
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 9.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- —
CMU.L vs. PRUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select | 15.89% | 25.71% | 1.42% | 14.39% | -5.30% | 13.03% | 8.26% |
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 2.88% | 13.57% | 5.85% | 7.37% | -22.76% | 12.69% | 22.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMU.L and PRUK.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.67 |
The correlation between CMU.L and PRUK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CMU.L vs. PRUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CMU.L
PRUK.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Energy
Technology
CMU.L
PRUK.L
Financial Services
CMU.L
PRUK.L
Industrials
CMU.L
PRUK.L
Consumer Cyclical
CMU.L
PRUK.L
Utilities
CMU.L
PRUK.L
Consumer Defensive
CMU.L
PRUK.L
Healthcare
CMU.L
PRUK.L
Basic Materials
CMU.L
PRUK.L
Communication Services
CMU.L
PRUK.L
Real Estate
CMU.L
PRUK.L
Energy
CMU.L
PRUK.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMU.L vs. PRUK.L — Risk / Return Rank
CMU.L
PRUK.L
CMU.L vs. PRUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMU.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.13 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 0.76 | +1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.67 | 2.52 | +7.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMU.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 0.70 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.05 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.38 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
CMU.L vs. PRUK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMU.L drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum PRUK.L drawdown of -36.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMU.L and PRUK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMU.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -36.10% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -13.05% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.95% | -18.00% | +6.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.11% | -36.10% | +14.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -3.76% | +3.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.80% | -14.80% | +9.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 3.93% | -0.88% |
Volatility
CMU.L vs. PRUK.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) at 4.82%. This indicates that CMU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMU.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 4.82% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 11.72% | +0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.86% | 14.14% | +0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 16.54% | -0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 17.45% | -0.67% |
CMU.L vs. PRUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PRUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CMU.L vs. PRUK.L - Dividend Comparison
CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 3.60% | 3.70% | 3.63% | 3.43% | 3.50% | 1.73% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMU.L and PRUK.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CMU.L.
CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CMU.L and 0.05% for PRUK.L.
Find the right allocation for CMU.L and PRUK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer