PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRUK.L vs. MIVO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRUK.L vs. MIVO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRUK.L achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than MIVO.L's 3.78% return.


PRUK.L

1D
-1.21%
1M
2.07%
YTD
1.86%
6M
4.66%
1Y
9.73%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*

MIVO.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
3.78%
6M
4.94%
1Y
7.90%
3Y*
10.09%
5Y*
7.25%
10Y*
7.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRUK.L vs. MIVO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PRUK.L
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)
1.86%13.57%5.85%7.37%-22.76%12.69%22.98%
MIVO.L
Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS
3.78%17.54%6.50%8.50%-7.95%13.43%2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PRUK.L and MIVO.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020

0.55

The correlation between PRUK.L and MIVO.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRUK.L vs. MIVO.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRUK.L
MIVO.L

Industrials

22.2%
15.5%

Financial Services

19.9%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
3.3%

Real Estate

8.0%
1.5%

Basic Materials

7.3%
3.6%

Technology

7.0%
2.5%

Communication Services

6.8%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
13.3%

Utilities

3.4%
10.5%

Energy

2.9%
9.9%

Healthcare

2.9%
13.1%

Industrials

PRUK.L
22.2%
MIVO.L
15.5%

Financial Services

PRUK.L
19.9%
MIVO.L
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PRUK.L
13.2%
MIVO.L
3.3%

Real Estate

PRUK.L
8.0%
MIVO.L
1.5%

Basic Materials

PRUK.L
7.3%
MIVO.L
3.6%

Technology

PRUK.L
7.0%
MIVO.L
2.5%

Communication Services

PRUK.L
6.8%
MIVO.L
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

PRUK.L
6.4%
MIVO.L
13.3%

Utilities

PRUK.L
3.4%
MIVO.L
10.5%

Energy

PRUK.L
2.9%
MIVO.L
9.9%

Healthcare

PRUK.L
2.9%
MIVO.L
13.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRUK.L vs. MIVO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRUK.L
PRUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

MIVO.L
MIVO.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MIVO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIVO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRUK.L vs. MIVO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRUK.LMIVO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.16

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

0.94

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.48

2.79

-0.31

PRUK.L vs. MIVO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the MIVO.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRUK.L and MIVO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRUK.LMIVO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

0.88

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.66

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.73

-0.37

Drawdowns

PRUK.L vs. MIVO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRUK.L drawdown since its inception was -36.10%, which is greater than MIVO.L's maximum drawdown of -24.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRUK.L and MIVO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRUK.LMIVO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.10%

-24.30%

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.05%

-8.38%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.00%

-8.38%

-9.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.10%

-17.54%

-18.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.72%

-5.37%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.81%

-3.61%

-11.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

2.82%

+1.10%

Volatility

PRUK.L vs. MIVO.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) at 2.84%. This indicates that PRUK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIVO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRUK.LMIVO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

2.84%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

7.43%

+4.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.11%

8.93%

+5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.53%

10.94%

+5.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

12.25%

+5.20%

PRUK.L vs. MIVO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRUK.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MIVO.L's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRUK.L vs. MIVO.L - Dividend Comparison

PRUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, while MIVO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
MIVO.L
Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRUK.L
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)
3.63%3.70%3.63%3.43%3.50%1.73%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRUK.L and MIVO.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for MIVO.L.

PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while MIVO.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRUK.L and 0.13% for MIVO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRUK.L and MIVO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer