PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMU.L vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMU.L vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CMU.L is traded in GBp, while GRID is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GRID values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMU.L achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 16.60% return. Over the past 10 years, CMU.L has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 10.12%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 18.16% annualized return.


CMU.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-3.51%
6M
14.95%
YTD
15.46%
1Y
26.13%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
10.12%
ALL TIME*
8.12%

GRID

1D
-0.28%
1M
-10.20%
6M
11.24%
YTD
16.60%
1Y
25.04%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
15.35%
10Y*
18.16%
ALL TIME*
13.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMU.L vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select
15.46%25.71%1.42%14.39%-5.30%13.03%4.59%19.05%-11.56%17.21%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
16.60%20.42%17.20%15.50%-3.65%28.86%44.47%37.37%-18.11%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CMU.L and GRID is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2011

0.55

The correlation between CMU.L and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

CMU.L vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CMU.L
GRID

Financial Services

28.4%

-

Technology

20.7%
11.6%

Industrials

16.7%
67.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
3.6%

Utilities

6.4%
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%

-

Healthcare

4.5%

-

Basic Materials

3.5%
0.0%

Communication Services

2.2%

-

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Energy

0.0%
1.6%

Financial Services

CMU.L
28.4%
GRID

-

Technology

CMU.L
20.7%
GRID
11.6%

Industrials

CMU.L
16.7%
GRID
67.4%

Consumer Cyclical

CMU.L
10.5%
GRID
3.6%

Utilities

CMU.L
6.4%
GRID
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

CMU.L
6.1%
GRID

-

Healthcare

CMU.L
4.5%
GRID

-

Basic Materials

CMU.L
3.5%
GRID
0.0%

Communication Services

CMU.L
2.2%
GRID

-

Real Estate

CMU.L
1.0%
GRID

-

Energy

CMU.L
0.0%
GRID
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMU.L vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMU.L
CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMU.L vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMU.LGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.22

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

2.25

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.43

6.83

+1.60

CMU.L vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMU.L and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMU.L vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMU.L drawdown since its inception was -31.46%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -34.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMU.L and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMU.LGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.46%

-34.09%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-11.18%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.95%

-22.93%

+10.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.11%

-22.93%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.41%

-34.09%

+2.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.81%

-11.18%

+7.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-6.97%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

3.67%

-0.58%

Volatility

CMU.L vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) is 3.79%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 8.38%. This indicates that CMU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMU.LGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

8.38%

-4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.80%

17.53%

-4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.08%

20.26%

-5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

19.25%

-3.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

21.57%

-4.89%

CMU.L vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMU.L vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.81%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMU.L and GRID have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

CMU.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CMU.L and 0.70% for GRID.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMU.L and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer