CMU.L vs. GRID
CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) and GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CMU.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CMU.L returned 10.12%/yr vs 18.16%/yr for GRID. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CMU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GRID.
Performance
CMU.L vs. GRID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CMU.L is traded in GBp, while GRID is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GRID values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMU.L achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 16.60% return. Over the past 10 years, CMU.L has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 10.12%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 18.16% annualized return.
CMU.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- YTD
- 15.46%
- 1Y
- 26.13%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.12%
GRID
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -10.20%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- YTD
- 16.60%
- 1Y
- 25.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.77%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 18.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.97%
CMU.L vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select | 15.46% | 25.71% | 1.42% | 14.39% | -5.30% | 13.03% | 4.59% | 19.05% | -11.56% | 17.21% |
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 16.60% | 20.42% | 17.20% | 15.50% | -3.65% | 28.86% | 44.47% | 37.37% | -18.11% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMU.L and GRID is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2011 | 0.55 |
The correlation between CMU.L and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
CMU.L vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CMU.L
GRID
Financial Services
-
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
Financial Services
CMU.L
GRID
-
Technology
CMU.L
GRID
Industrials
CMU.L
GRID
Consumer Cyclical
CMU.L
GRID
Utilities
CMU.L
GRID
Consumer Defensive
CMU.L
GRID
-
Healthcare
CMU.L
GRID
-
Basic Materials
CMU.L
GRID
Communication Services
CMU.L
GRID
-
Real Estate
CMU.L
GRID
-
Energy
CMU.L
GRID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMU.L vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank
CMU.L
GRID
CMU.L vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMU.L | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.22 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.25 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.43 | 6.83 | +1.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMU.L vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMU.L drawdown since its inception was -31.46%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -34.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMU.L and GRID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMU.L | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.46% | -34.09% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -11.18% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.95% | -22.93% | +10.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.11% | -22.93% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.41% | -34.09% | +2.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.81% | -11.18% | +7.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -6.97% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 3.67% | -0.58% |
Volatility
CMU.L vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) is 3.79%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 8.38%. This indicates that CMU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMU.L | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 8.38% | -4.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.80% | 17.53% | -4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.08% | 20.26% | -5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 19.25% | -3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 21.57% | -4.89% |
CMU.L vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMU.L vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison
CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GRID First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund | 0.81% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMU.L and GRID have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.
CMU.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CMU.L and 0.70% for GRID.
Find the right allocation for CMU.L and GRID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer