CMNY.TO vs. CEQP.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CMNY.TO (CI Money Market ETF CAD Series) and CEQP.TO (CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CMNY.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by CI, while CEQP.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. CMNY.TO charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CEQP.TO.

Performance

CMNY.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Money Market ETF CAD Series (CMNY.TO) and CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF (CEQP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CMNY.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 0.99%
• 6M: 1.19%
• 1Y: 2.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CEQP.TO

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 4.99%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMNY.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CMNY.TO CI Money Market ETF CAD Series	0.83%
CEQP.TO CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF	7.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CMNY.TO and CEQP.TO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026	-0.07

Return for Risk

CMNY.TO vs. CEQP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMNY.TO

CMNY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
CMNY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CMNY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CMNY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CMNY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CMNY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMNY.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Money Market ETF CAD Series (CMNY.TO) and CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF (CEQP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMNY.TO	CEQP.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	7.55	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	17.38	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.69	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	50.46	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	202.96	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMNY.TO	CEQP.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.73	1.37	+2.36

Drawdowns

CMNY.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMNY.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.83%, smaller than the maximum CEQP.TO drawdown of -8.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMNY.TO and CEQP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMNY.TO	CEQP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.83%	-8.33%	+7.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.05%	-1.89%	+1.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CMNY.TO	CEQP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.08%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.26%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34%	16.40%	-16.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.02%	16.40%	-15.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.02%	16.40%	-15.38%

CMNY.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMNY.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than CEQP.TO's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMNY.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Dividend Comparison

CMNY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than CEQP.TO's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CEQP.TO CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CMNY.TO CI Money Market ETF CAD Series	2.55%	2.89%	4.64%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMNY.TO and CEQP.TO in my portfolio?

CMNY.TO and CEQP.TO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CMNY.TO or CEQP.TO?

On fees, CMNY.TO is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CMNY.TO or CEQP.TO?

CMNY.TO is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CEQP.TO.

What is the main difference between CMNY.TO and CEQP.TO?

CMNY.TO is categorized as Money Market, while CEQP.TO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for CMNY.TO and 0.30% for CEQP.TO.