CEQP.TO vs. MIX.TO
CEQP.TO (CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF) and MIX.TO (Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. CEQP.TO is actively managed, while MIX.TO is passively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEQP.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for MIX.TO.
Performance
CEQP.TO vs. MIX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CEQP.TO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MIX.TO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 3.91%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 28.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEQP.TO vs. MIX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CEQP.TO CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF | 7.21% |
MIX.TO Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF | 1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEQP.TO and MIX.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEQP.TO vs. MIX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CEQP.TO
MIX.TO
CEQP.TO vs. MIX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF (CEQP.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF (MIX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEQP.TO | MIX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.37 | 2.53 | -1.16 |
Drawdowns
CEQP.TO vs. MIX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEQP.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.33%, smaller than the maximum MIX.TO drawdown of -10.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEQP.TO and MIX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEQP.TO | MIX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.33% | -10.71% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.70% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -1.38% | -0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.56% | — |
Volatility
CEQP.TO vs. MIX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEQP.TO | MIX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 12.82% | +3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 12.63% | +3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 12.63% | +3.77% |
CEQP.TO vs. MIX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEQP.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MIX.TO's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEQP.TO vs. MIX.TO - Dividend Comparison
CEQP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than MIX.TO's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CEQP.TO CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF | 0.01% | 0.00% |
MIX.TO Hamilton Enhanced Mixed Asset ETF | 1.57% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEQP.TO and MIX.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MIX.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MIX.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CEQP.TO.
They also come from different issuers: CI and Hamilton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CEQP.TO and 0.00% for MIX.TO.
Find the right allocation for CEQP.TO and MIX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer