PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CMNY.TO vs. CIC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

CMNY.TO vs. CIC.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CI Money Market ETF CAD Series (CMNY.TO) and CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO).

CMNY.TO and CIC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CMNY.TO is an actively managed fund by CI. It was launched on Jul 25, 2023. CIC.TO is an actively managed fund by CI. It was launched on Aug 18, 2010.

Performance

CMNY.TO vs. CIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Money Market ETF CAD Series (CMNY.TO) and CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CMNY.TO vs. CIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
CMNY.TO
CI Money Market ETF CAD Series		0.57%2.83%4.77%2.14%
CIC.TO
CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF		1.51%36.24%21.30%2.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMNY.TO achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than CIC.TO's 1.51% return.

CMNY.TO

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.57%
6M
1.16%
1Y
2.60%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

CIC.TO

1D
1.51%
1M
-3.47%
YTD
1.51%
6M
12.87%
1Y
42.80%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CI Money Market ETF CAD Series

CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF

Often compared with CMNY.TO:
CMNY.TO vs. CCOM.TOCMNY.TO vs. HISA.NEOCMNY.TO vs. VXM-B.TOCMNY.TO vs. MNY.TOCMNY.TO vs. CGXF.TOCMNY.TO vs. PSA.TOCMNY.TO vs. HSUV-U.TO
Often compared with CIC.TO:
CIC.TO vs. CCOM.TOCIC.TO vs. ZEB.TOCIC.TO vs. FMAX.TOCIC.TO vs. VXM-B.TOCIC.TO vs. SIXY.TOCIC.TO vs. CEW.TOCIC.TO vs. HEB.TO

CMNY.TO vs. CIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMNY.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than CIC.TO's 0.87% expense ratio.

CIC.TO
CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF
CMNY.TO
CI Money Market ETF CAD Series

Return for Risk

CMNY.TO vs. CIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CMNY.TO
CMNY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CMNY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMNY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMNY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CMNY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMNY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
CIC.TO
CIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMNY.TO vs. CIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Money Market ETF CAD Series (CMNY.TO) and CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CMNY.TOCIC.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.86

3.45

+3.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

15.54

4.45

+11.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

3.35

1.71

+1.64

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

43.70

5.28

+38.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

176.75

22.30

+154.45

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMNY.TO vs. CIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMNY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 6.86, which is higher than the CIC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMNY.TO and CIC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CMNY.TOCIC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.86

3.45

+3.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

1.08

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.73

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.72

0.64

+3.07

Correlation

The correlation between CMNY.TO and CIC.TO is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CMNY.TO vs. CIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

CMNY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than CIC.TO's 5.85% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMNY.TO
CI Money Market ETF CAD Series		2.64%2.89%4.64%2.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CIC.TO
CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF		5.85%5.72%6.71%7.37%7.64%5.48%9.56%6.16%6.61%5.68%6.72%7.31%

Drawdowns

CMNY.TO vs. CIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMNY.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.83%, smaller than the maximum CIC.TO drawdown of -38.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMNY.TO and CIC.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

CMNY.TOCIC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-38.55%

+37.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.06%

-8.23%

+8.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-26.34%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-38.55%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-5.35%

+5.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-5.54%

+5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

1.95%

-1.94%

Volatility

CMNY.TO vs. CIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Money Market ETF CAD Series (CMNY.TO) is 0.09%, while CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that CMNY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

CMNY.TOCIC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

5.39%

-5.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.25%

9.06%

-8.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38%

12.48%

-12.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.05%

12.56%

-11.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.05%

16.26%

-15.21%