CEQP.TO vs. CEQT.TO
CEQP.TO (CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF) and CEQT.TO (CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from CI. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.
Performance
CEQP.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CEQP.TO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEQT.TO
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 6.45%
- YTD
- 13.14%
- 6M
- 13.90%
- 1Y
- 32.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEQP.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CEQP.TO CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF | 7.21% |
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 8.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEQP.TO and CEQT.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEQP.TO vs. CEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CEQP.TO
CEQT.TO
CEQP.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF (CEQP.TO) and CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEQP.TO | CEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.37 | 1.67 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
CEQP.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEQP.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.33%, smaller than the maximum CEQT.TO drawdown of -14.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEQP.TO and CEQT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEQP.TO | CEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.33% | -14.02% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -1.19% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.79% | — |
Volatility
CEQP.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEQP.TO | CEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 10.58% | +5.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 13.11% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 13.11% | +3.29% |
CEQP.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CEQP.TO and CEQT.TO have an expense ratio of 0.30%.
Dividends
CEQP.TO vs. CEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
CEQP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than CEQT.TO's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CEQP.TO CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 0.90% | 1.25% | 1.82% | 1.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEQP.TO and CEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEQP.TO and CEQT.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.
Find the right allocation for CEQP.TO and CEQT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer