CMMVX vs. FSRRX
CMMVX (Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund) and FSRRX (Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 3 years, CMMVX returned 13.81%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for FSRRX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CMMVX charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FSRRX.
Performance
CMMVX vs. FSRRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMMVX achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly lower than FSRRX's 8.46% return.
CMMVX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 8.03%
- 1Y
- 17.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSRRX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 9.18%
- 1Y
- 16.36%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 5.61%
CMMVX vs. FSRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMMVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund | 7.46% | 13.09% | 12.44% | 16.24% | -15.57% | 2.78% |
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund | 8.46% | 10.45% | 5.84% | 4.59% | -3.34% | 2.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMMVX and FSRRX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CMMVX and FSRRX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMMVX vs. FSRRX — Risk / Return Rank
CMMVX
FSRRX
CMMVX vs. FSRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMMVX | FSRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.29 | 3.61 | -1.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.30 | 5.03 | -1.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.72 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 8.19 | -5.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.73 | 32.37 | -19.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMMVX | FSRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 3.61 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.59 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
CMMVX vs. FSRRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMMVX drawdown since its inception was -20.58%, smaller than the maximum FSRRX drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMMVX and FSRRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMMVX | FSRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.58% | -33.42% | +12.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.31% | -2.05% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.51% | -5.80% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.93% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -4.21% | -1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 0.52% | +0.91% |
Volatility
CMMVX vs. FSRRX - Volatility Comparison
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund (CMMVX) has a higher volatility of 2.38% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) at 1.28%. This indicates that CMMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMMVX | FSRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.38% | 1.28% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.27% | 3.69% | +2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.02% | 4.72% | +3.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.69% | 6.88% | +3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.69% | 6.73% | +3.96% |
CMMVX vs. FSRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMMVX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRRX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMMVX vs. FSRRX - Dividend Comparison
CMMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than FSRRX's 4.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMMVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 60/40 Beta Plus Fund | 3.43% | 3.68% | 3.00% | 2.31% | 1.76% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund | 4.14% | 4.68% | 4.82% | 5.29% | 7.31% | 5.35% | 2.25% | 3.05% | 9.39% | 1.57% | 2.34% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMMVX and FSRRX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMMVX has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to FSRRX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMMVX dropped -20.58% vs FSRRX's -33.42%.
FSRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMMVX and FSRRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer