PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMIEX vs. FFANX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMIEX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund (CMIEX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMIEX achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than FFANX's 6.38% return.


CMIEX

1D
-2.22%
1M
1.01%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.48%
1Y
21.67%
3Y*
17.07%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*

FFANX

1D
-1.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
6.38%
6M
6.02%
1Y
14.49%
3Y*
10.91%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*
6.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMIEX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CMIEX
Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund
8.72%32.46%3.96%21.41%-15.46%6.89%16.20%23.87%-16.02%
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
6.38%13.16%7.40%11.52%-13.62%8.03%13.10%15.81%-4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between CMIEX and FFANX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018

0.85

The correlation between CMIEX and FFANX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMIEX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMIEX
CMIEX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CMIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CMIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FFANX
FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMIEX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund (CMIEX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMIEXFFANXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.42

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.95

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.74

12.54

-5.80

CMIEX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the FFANX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMIEX and FFANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMIEX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMIEX drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, which is greater than FFANX's maximum drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMIEX and FFANX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMIEXFFANXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.35%

-31.69%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.08%

-5.20%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.50%

-7.55%

-6.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.27%

-18.52%

-13.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.22%

-1.13%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-3.79%

-2.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

1.22%

+2.31%

Volatility

CMIEX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison

Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund (CMIEX) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) at 3.12%. This indicates that CMIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMIEXFFANXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

3.12%

+2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

6.09%

+7.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.33%

7.15%

+9.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

7.95%

+8.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

7.73%

+10.66%

CMIEX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMIEX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMIEX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

CMIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, more than FFANX's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMIEX
Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund
8.21%8.92%7.54%2.26%2.44%3.21%1.30%2.47%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
3.69%3.97%2.81%2.49%5.75%2.35%2.36%3.67%4.56%2.56%1.43%3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, CMIEX and FFANX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CMIEX has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to FFANX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMIEX dropped -35.35% vs FFANX's -31.69%.

FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMIEX and FFANX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer