PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMIEX vs. VRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMIEX vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund (CMIEX) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMIEX achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 96.57% return.


CMIEX

1D
0.07%
1M
3.31%
YTD
11.19%
6M
11.03%
1Y
26.51%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*

VRT

1D
-11.07%
1M
-2.77%
YTD
96.57%
6M
91.55%
1Y
173.44%
3Y*
138.19%
5Y*
63.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMIEX vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CMIEX
Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund
11.19%32.46%3.96%21.41%-15.46%6.89%16.20%23.87%-15.00%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
96.57%42.80%136.82%251.81%-45.25%33.80%69.36%12.55%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CMIEX and VRT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMIEX vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMIEX
CMIEX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CMIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
CMIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMIEX vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund (CMIEX) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMIEXVRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

6.89

-4.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

18.18

-10.39

CMIEX vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMIEX and VRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMIEX vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMIEX drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum VRT drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMIEX and VRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMIEXVRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.35%

-71.24%

+35.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.08%

-25.32%

+12.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.50%

-61.28%

+46.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.27%

-71.24%

+38.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-15.37%

+15.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-16.22%

+9.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

9.58%

-6.06%

Volatility

CMIEX vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund (CMIEX) is 5.35%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 20.96%. This indicates that CMIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMIEXVRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

20.96%

-15.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.75%

46.74%

-32.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

60.09%

-43.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.69%

62.33%

-45.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.38%

54.83%

-36.45%

Dividends

CMIEX vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

CMIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, more than VRT's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CMIEX
Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund
8.03%8.92%7.54%2.26%2.44%3.21%1.30%2.47%0.83%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.07%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMIEX and VRT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRT has higher volatility (20.96%) compared to CMIEX (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMIEX dropped -35.35% vs VRT's -71.24%.

VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMIEX and VRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer