CME vs. SMR
CME (CME Group Inc.) and SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) are both stocks. CME operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services), while SMR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, CME returned 9.17%/yr vs -0.32%/yr for SMR. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CME vs. SMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CME achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly higher than SMR's -30.20% return.
CME
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -9.35%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 15.38%
SMR
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -11.93%
- YTD
- -30.20%
- 6M
- -46.07%
- 1Y
- -74.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.43%
- 5Y*
- -0.32%
- 10Y*
- —
CME vs. SMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CME CME Group Inc. | 1.58% | 19.83% | 15.41% | 31.32% | -22.89% | 29.47% | 1.14% |
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | -30.20% | -20.97% | 444.98% | -67.93% | 2.29% | -0.89% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between CME and SMR is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | -0.02 |
The correlation between CME and SMR shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.02 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CME:
$97.90B
SMR:
$3.16B
CME:
$11.75
SMR:
-$2.02
CME:
14.40
SMR:
104.42
CME:
3.68
SMR:
2.71
CME:
$6.76B
SMR:
$18.10M
CME:
$5.84B
SMR:
$4.45M
CME:
$5.69B
SMR:
-$696.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CME vs. SMR — Risk / Return Rank
CME
SMR
CME vs. SMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CME Group Inc. (CME) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CME | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.87 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.91 | +1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.50 | -1.32 | +1.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CME vs. SMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CME drawdown since its inception was -77.50%, smaller than the maximum SMR drawdown of -87.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CME and SMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CME | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.50% | -87.47% | +9.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.42% | -82.86% | +61.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.42% | -82.86% | +61.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.74% | -87.47% | +55.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.03% | -81.49% | +66.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.68% | -35.08% | +14.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.70% | 57.39% | -50.69% |
Volatility
CME vs. SMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CME Group Inc. (CME) is 10.45%, while NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a volatility of 28.93%. This indicates that CME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CME | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.45% | 28.93% | -18.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.44% | 69.57% | -52.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.74% | 102.59% | -81.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 93.50% | -73.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.93% | 89.31% | -65.38% |
Dividends
CME vs. SMR - Dividend Comparison
CME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, while SMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CME CME Group Inc. | 4.17% | 1.83% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 5.05% | 3.00% | 3.24% | 2.74% | 2.42% | 4.20% | 4.90% | 5.41% |
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CME vs. SMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CME Group Inc. and NuScale Power Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CME and SMR have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMR has higher volatility (28.93%) compared to CME (10.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CME dropped -77.50% vs SMR's -87.47%.
CME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CME and SMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer