PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMDY vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CMDY vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CMDY vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
21.23%15.81%6.27%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-22.18%-6.41%99.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMDY achieves a 21.23% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -22.18% return.


CMDY

1D
-0.54%
1M
6.54%
YTD
21.23%
6M
26.39%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
12.40%
5Y*
12.67%
10Y*

IBIT

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
-22.18%
6M
-42.10%
1Y
-20.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CMDY vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMDY has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CMDY vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMDY
CMDY Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMDY vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMDYIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

-0.44

+2.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

-0.37

+2.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.96

+0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

-0.35

+3.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.38

-0.75

+10.13

CMDY vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMDY and IBIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMDYIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

-0.44

+2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.36

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between CMDY and IBIT is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CMDY vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

CMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.64%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
10.64%12.89%4.23%5.10%3.98%16.09%0.15%2.21%1.73%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CMDY vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMDY drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMDY and IBIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CMDYIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.19%

-49.36%

+18.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.57%

-49.36%

+39.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-45.80%

+44.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.38%

-14.18%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

23.27%

-20.21%

Volatility

CMDY vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) is 6.76%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that CMDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CMDYIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

12.95%

-6.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

36.76%

-23.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

45.40%

-28.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.63%

51.21%

-35.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.54%

51.21%

-36.67%