PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMDT vs. BCD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CMDT vs. BCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CMDT vs. BCD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMDT achieves a 16.96% return, which is significantly higher than BCD's 15.57% return.


CMDT

1D
-0.74%
1M
8.58%
YTD
16.96%
6M
19.62%
1Y
24.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCD

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.50%
YTD
15.57%
6M
21.94%
1Y
22.76%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CMDT vs. BCD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMDT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BCD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CMDT vs. BCD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMDT
CMDT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CMDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CMDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

BCD
BCD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
BCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMDT vs. BCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMDTBCDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

1.51

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.50

2.02

+0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.42

+0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.00

7.58

+2.42

CMDT vs. BCD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMDT Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the BCD Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMDT and BCD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMDTBCDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.51

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.22

0.65

+0.58

Correlation

The correlation between CMDT and BCD is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CMDT vs. BCD - Dividend Comparison

CMDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than BCD's 14.89% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMDT
PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund
2.60%3.04%8.80%2.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
14.89%17.21%3.60%4.51%5.21%8.30%1.29%1.55%1.59%0.07%

Drawdowns

CMDT vs. BCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMDT drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum BCD drawdown of -29.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMDT and BCD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CMDTBCDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.69%

-29.81%

+20.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-9.75%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-2.53%

+1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-10.01%

+7.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

3.11%

-0.60%

Volatility

CMDT vs. BCD - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) have volatilities of 5.26% and 5.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CMDTBCDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

5.53%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

11.60%

-2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.23%

15.15%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.13%

15.42%

-3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.13%

13.93%

-1.80%