CMCX.L vs. RLGT
CMCX.L (CMC Markets plc) and RLGT (Radiant Logistics, Inc.) are both stocks. CMCX.L operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while RLGT operates in Integrated Freight & Logistics (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CMCX.L returned 10.03%/yr vs 11.10%/yr for RLGT. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMCX.L vs. RLGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CMCX.L is traded in GBp, while RLGT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RLGT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMCX.L achieves a 55.18% return, which is significantly higher than RLGT's 46.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CMCX.L has underperformed RLGT with an annualized return of 10.03%, while RLGT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.10% annualized return.
CMCX.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 22.43%
- YTD
- 55.18%
- 6M
- 62.81%
- 1Y
- 93.05%
- 3Y*
- 46.87%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
RLGT
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 10.30%
- YTD
- 46.08%
- 6M
- 37.38%
- 1Y
- 56.81%
- 3Y*
- 9.07%
- 5Y*
- 5.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.10%
CMCX.L vs. RLGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCX.L CMC Markets plc | 55.18% | 27.16% | 144.09% | -51.43% | -10.97% | -28.25% | 183.92% | 43.23% | -26.78% | 45.42% |
RLGT Radiant Logistics, Inc. | 46.08% | -12.25% | 2.67% | 23.93% | -21.88% | 26.88% | 1.07% | 26.07% | -2.13% | 7.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMCX.L and RLGT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2016 | 0.04 |
The correlation between CMCX.L and RLGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (10 years) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CMCX.L:
£1.30B
RLGT:
$446.58M
CMCX.L:
£0.50
RLGT:
$0.33
CMCX.L:
9.36
RLGT:
27.67
CMCX.L:
1.23
RLGT:
0.99
CMCX.L:
1.69
RLGT:
0.50
CMCX.L:
2.84
RLGT:
1.91
CMCX.L:
£755.33M
RLGT:
$893.50M
CMCX.L:
£533.42M
RLGT:
$113.69M
CMCX.L:
£232.99M
RLGT:
$27.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMCX.L vs. RLGT — Risk / Return Rank
CMCX.L
RLGT
CMCX.L vs. RLGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L) and Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMCX.L | RLGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.29 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.16 | 3.51 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.26 | 7.87 | +5.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMCX.L vs. RLGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMCX.L drawdown since its inception was -81.04%, smaller than the maximum RLGT drawdown of -89.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCX.L and RLGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMCX.L | RLGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.04% | -89.59% | +8.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.02% | -15.68% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.29% | -34.51% | -10.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.60% | -41.72% | -36.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.04% | -52.18% | -28.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | 0.00% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.52% | -29.27% | -11.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.63% | 6.97% | -0.34% |
Volatility
CMCX.L vs. RLGT - Volatility Comparison
CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L) has a higher volatility of 17.61% compared to Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) at 7.57%. This indicates that CMCX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMCX.L | RLGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.61% | 7.57% | +10.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.26% | 31.51% | -7.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.97% | 38.23% | +3.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.85% | 37.76% | +9.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.35% | 44.00% | +2.35% |
Dividends
CMCX.L vs. RLGT - Dividend Comparison
CMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, while RLGT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCX.L CMC Markets plc | 2.97% | 4.62% | 4.19% | 4.67% | 5.53% | 9.46% | 5.47% | 2.41% | 6.94% | 5.95% |
RLGT Radiant Logistics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CMCX.L vs. RLGT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CMC Markets plc and Radiant Logistics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CMCX.L vs. RLGT - Profitability Comparison
CMCX.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMC Markets plc reported a gross profit of 188.08M and revenue of 217.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.6%.
RLGT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 214.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CMCX.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMC Markets plc reported an operating income of 57.64M and revenue of 217.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.5%.
RLGT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.55M and revenue of 214.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
CMCX.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMC Markets plc reported a net income of 38.42M and revenue of 217.26M, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
RLGT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported a net income of 4.67M and revenue of 214.14M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMCX.L and RLGT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CMCX.L and RLGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer