CMCX.L vs. NBIS
CMCX.L (CMC Markets plc) and NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) are both stocks. CMCX.L operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while NBIS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past year, CMCX.L returned 93.05% vs 399.16% for NBIS. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMCX.L vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CMCX.L is traded in GBp, while NBIS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NBIS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMCX.L achieves a 55.18% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 179.01% return.
CMCX.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 22.43%
- YTD
- 55.18%
- 6M
- 62.81%
- 1Y
- 93.05%
- 3Y*
- 46.87%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
NBIS
- 1D
- 4.64%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- YTD
- 179.01%
- 6M
- 164.32%
- 1Y
- 399.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMCX.L vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CMCX.L CMC Markets plc | 55.18% | 27.16% | -25.84% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 179.01% | 180.66% | 52.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMCX.L and NBIS is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
CMCX.L:
£1.30B
NBIS:
$71.79B
CMCX.L:
£0.50
NBIS:
$3.17
CMCX.L:
9.36
NBIS:
73.19
CMCX.L:
1.23
NBIS:
25.15
CMCX.L:
1.69
NBIS:
69.73
CMCX.L:
2.84
NBIS:
9.91
CMCX.L:
£755.33M
NBIS:
$877.90M
CMCX.L:
£533.42M
NBIS:
$420.60M
CMCX.L:
£232.99M
NBIS:
-$52.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMCX.L vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank
CMCX.L
NBIS
CMCX.L vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMCX.L | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.42 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.16 | 8.05 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.26 | 18.58 | -5.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMCX.L vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMCX.L drawdown since its inception was -81.04%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -59.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCX.L and NBIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMCX.L | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.04% | -59.36% | -21.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.02% | -46.25% | +29.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -11.81% | +11.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.52% | -19.22% | -21.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.63% | 20.01% | -13.38% |
Volatility
CMCX.L vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L) is 17.61%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 30.36%. This indicates that CMCX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMCX.L | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.61% | 30.36% | -12.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.26% | 70.72% | -46.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.97% | 103.97% | -62.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.85% | 110.15% | -63.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.35% | 110.15% | -63.80% |
Dividends
CMCX.L vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison
CMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, while NBIS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCX.L CMC Markets plc | 2.97% | 4.62% | 4.19% | 4.67% | 5.53% | 9.46% | 5.47% | 2.41% | 6.94% | 5.95% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CMCX.L vs. NBIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CMC Markets plc and Nebius Group N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CMCX.L and NBIS have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CMCX.L and NBIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer