CMCI vs. RLY
CMCI (VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF) and RLY (State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CMCI is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS Bloomberg CMCI Composite Total Return Index, while RLY is a Global Allocation fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CMCI returned 28.88% vs 27.64% for RLY. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CMCI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RLY.
Performance
CMCI vs. RLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMCI achieves a 21.78% return, which is significantly higher than RLY's 15.77% return.
CMCI
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 15.17%
- YTD
- 21.78%
- 1Y
- 28.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.77%
RLY
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- 6M
- 7.44%
- YTD
- 15.77%
- 1Y
- 27.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.50K | $2.03K | $12.86K | |
| $4.60M | $7.84M | $7.75M |
CMCI vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCI VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF | 21.78% | 7.90% | 5.68% | -2.74% |
RLY State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 15.77% | 20.26% | 2.53% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMCI and RLY is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023 | 0.63 |
The correlation between CMCI and RLY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMCI vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank
CMCI
RLY
CMCI vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMCI | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.48 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 3.66 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 12.77 | -3.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMCI vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMCI drawdown since its inception was -11.54%, smaller than the maximum RLY drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCI and RLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMCI | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.54% | -37.75% | +26.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.77% | -7.54% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.08% | -2.74% | -1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -9.40% | +5.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 2.16% | +0.88% |
Volatility
CMCI vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison
VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) at 2.68%. This indicates that CMCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMCI | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 2.68% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.52% | 8.44% | +2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 10.60% | +2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 13.46% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 13.80% | -1.15% |
CMCI vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMCI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMCI vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison
CMCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than RLY's 3.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCI VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF | 8.12% | 9.89% | 3.93% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RLY State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 3.06% | 3.24% | 3.31% | 3.71% | 5.66% | 12.15% | 2.16% | 3.45% | 2.76% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMCI and RLY have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMCI has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to RLY (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMCI dropped -11.54% vs RLY's -37.75%.
On 1-year performance, CMCI leads with 28.88% vs 27.64% for RLY. On fees, RLY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RLY has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CMCI has performed better with a 28.88% return vs 27.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RLY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMCI.
CMCI has the higher dividend yield at 8.12%, compared with 3.06% for RLY.
CMCI is categorized as Commodities, while RLY is Global Allocation. CMCI tracks UBS Bloomberg CMCI Composite Total Return Index, while RLY tracks Bloomberg U.S. Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CMCI and 0.50% for RLY.
RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMCI and RLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer