PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMCI vs. BCD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CMCI vs. BCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CMCI vs. BCD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CMCI
VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF
16.28%7.90%5.68%-2.87%
BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
15.12%15.71%6.20%-3.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMCI achieves a 16.28% return, which is significantly higher than BCD's 15.12% return.


CMCI

1D
0.25%
1M
6.95%
YTD
16.28%
6M
19.48%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCD

1D
0.14%
1M
3.54%
YTD
15.12%
6M
21.12%
1Y
21.78%
3Y*
10.53%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CMCI vs. BCD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMCI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BCD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CMCI vs. BCD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMCI
CMCI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CMCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCI Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

BCD
BCD Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCD Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCD Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMCI vs. BCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMCIBCDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

1.44

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.91

1.94

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

2.29

-0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.93

7.16

-0.23

CMCI vs. BCD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the BCD Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMCI and BCD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMCIBCDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.44

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.64

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between CMCI and BCD is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CMCI vs. BCD - Dividend Comparison

CMCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, less than BCD's 14.95% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMCI
VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF
8.50%9.89%3.93%1.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
14.95%17.21%3.60%4.51%5.21%8.30%1.29%1.55%1.59%0.07%

Drawdowns

CMCI vs. BCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMCI drawdown since its inception was -11.54%, smaller than the maximum BCD drawdown of -29.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCI and BCD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CMCIBCDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.54%

-29.81%

+18.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.92%

-7.37%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-2.91%

+1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-10.01%

+6.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

3.12%

-0.31%

Volatility

CMCI vs. BCD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF (CMCI) is 4.79%, while abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) has a volatility of 5.52%. This indicates that CMCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CMCIBCDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

5.52%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

11.61%

-1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

15.15%

-1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

15.41%

-2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

13.93%

-1.32%