CMBO vs. CUSD

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CMBO (Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF) and CUSD (CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMBO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for CUSD.

Performance

CMBO vs. CUSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF (CMBO) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMBO achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly higher than CUSD's 1.42% return.

CMBO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CUSD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 3.50%
• 3Y*: 4.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMBO vs. CUSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CMBO Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF	1.63%	0.52%
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF	1.42%	-1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CMBO and CUSD is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

CMBO vs. CUSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUSD

CUSD Risk / Return Rank: 15
CUSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
CUSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CUSD Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CUSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
CUSD Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMBO vs. CUSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF (CMBO) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMBO	CUSD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	9.91	0.65	+9.26

Drawdowns

CMBO vs. CUSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMBO drawdown since its inception was -0.22%, smaller than the maximum CUSD drawdown of -5.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMBO and CUSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMBO	CUSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.22%	-5.42%	+5.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.42%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.75%	+2.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.01%	-0.47%	+0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CMBO	CUSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38%	13.67%	-13.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.38%	7.02%	-6.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.38%	7.02%	-6.64%

CMBO vs. CUSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMBO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CUSD's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMBO vs. CUSD - Dividend Comparison

CMBO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CUSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.85%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CMBO Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF	13.85%	14.05%	7.10%	3.62%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMBO and CUSD in my portfolio?

CMBO and CUSD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CMBO or CUSD?

On fees, CMBO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CMBO or CUSD?

CMBO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for CUSD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CMBO or CUSD?

CUSD has the higher dividend yield at 13.85%, compared with 0.00% for CMBO.

What is the main difference between CMBO and CUSD?

They also come from different issuers: Wayfinder and CrossingBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CMBO and 0.81% for CUSD.