CMBO vs. CUSD
CMBO (Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF) and CUSD (CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. CMBO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for CUSD.
Performance
CMBO vs. CUSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMBO achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly lower than CUSD's 2.92% return.
CMBO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CUSD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMBO vs. CUSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CMBO Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF | 2.10% | 0.55% |
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF | 2.92% | -1.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMBO and CUSD is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMBO vs. CUSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF (CMBO) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMBO | CUSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMBO vs. CUSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMBO drawdown since its inception was -0.22%, smaller than the maximum CUSD drawdown of -5.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMBO and CUSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMBO | CUSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -5.42% | +5.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.95% | +1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -0.51% | +0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility
CMBO vs. CUSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMBO | CUSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36% | 16.25% | -15.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.36% | 8.04% | -7.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.36% | 8.04% | -7.68% |
CMBO vs. CUSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMBO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CUSD's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMBO vs. CUSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither CMBO nor CUSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMBO Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF | 13.65% | 14.05% | 7.10% | 3.62% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMBO and CUSD have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMBO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMBO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for CUSD.
CUSD has the higher dividend yield at 13.65%, compared with 0.00% for CMBO.
They also come from different issuers: Wayfinder and CrossingBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CMBO and 0.81% for CUSD.
Find the right allocation for CMBO and CUSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer