PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMALX vs. BWBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMALX vs. BWBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMALX achieves a 5.28% return, which is significantly higher than BWBIX's -0.41% return.


CMALX

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
5.28%
6M
5.57%
1Y
8.67%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*

BWBIX

1D
-1.14%
1M
2.47%
YTD
-0.41%
6M
4.74%
1Y
9.88%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
4.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMALX vs. BWBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CMALX
Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund
5.28%5.26%11.36%6.42%-0.99%15.89%-7.01%20.24%-5.55%
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
-0.41%10.23%19.62%25.77%-32.58%14.76%62.85%36.41%-12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between CMALX and BWBIX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between CMALX and BWBIX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMALX vs. BWBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMALX
CMALX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CMALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMALX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
CMALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMALX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

BWBIX
BWBIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BWBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
BWBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMALX vs. BWBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMALXBWBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.14

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

0.89

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.97

2.94

+3.04

CMALX vs. BWBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the BWBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMALX and BWBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMALXBWBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

0.72

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.20

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.52

-0.08

Drawdowns

CMALX vs. BWBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMALX drawdown since its inception was -39.04%, roughly equal to the maximum BWBIX drawdown of -39.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMALX and BWBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMALXBWBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.04%

-39.14%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.49%

-11.65%

+7.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.66%

-21.59%

+13.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.68%

-39.14%

+26.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-2.39%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.76%

-11.72%

+7.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

3.53%

-2.13%

Volatility

CMALX vs. BWBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX) is 1.73%, while Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that CMALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMALXBWBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.73%

3.59%

-1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.20%

11.02%

-6.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.78%

14.41%

-8.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.00%

21.08%

-12.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.64%

23.14%

-10.50%

CMALX vs. BWBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMALX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BWBIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMALX vs. BWBIX - Dividend Comparison

CMALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, less than BWBIX's 7.64% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
7.64%7.61%0.77%0.06%3.21%3.75%1.24%3.51%0.14%0.00%
CMALX
Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund
7.41%7.61%3.94%4.66%4.93%3.21%3.67%5.07%4.87%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMALX and BWBIX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWBIX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to CMALX (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMALX dropped -39.04% vs BWBIX's -39.14%.

CMALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMALX and BWBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer