PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMAAX vs. CGJIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMAAX vs. CGJIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Moderate Allocation Fund (CMAAX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CMAAX having a 6.92% return and CGJIX slightly higher at 7.25%. Over the past 10 years, CMAAX has underperformed CGJIX with an annualized return of 7.90%, while CGJIX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.80% annualized return.


CMAAX

1D
1.26%
1M
-0.83%
6M
5.26%
YTD
6.92%
1Y
14.37%
3Y*
10.90%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*
7.90%
ALL TIME*
6.38%

CGJIX

1D
2.47%
1M
-1.39%
6M
7.29%
YTD
7.25%
1Y
16.78%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
16.80%
ALL TIME*
16.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CMAAX vs. CGJIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMAAX
Calvert Moderate Allocation Fund
6.92%12.70%10.06%12.87%-15.65%10.47%15.17%21.19%-5.13%12.93%
CGJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund
7.25%14.56%27.74%36.66%-26.84%26.13%38.69%35.29%0.74%27.39%

Correlation

The correlation between CMAAX and CGJIX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.89

The correlation between CMAAX and CGJIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMAAX vs. CGJIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CMAAX
CMAAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CMAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CMAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

CGJIX
CGJIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CGJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CGJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CMAAX vs. CGJIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Moderate Allocation Fund (CMAAX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMAAXCGJIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.17

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

1.27

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.64

4.75

+2.88

CMAAX vs. CGJIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the CGJIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMAAX and CGJIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMAAX vs. CGJIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMAAX drawdown since its inception was -42.64%, which is greater than CGJIX's maximum drawdown of -31.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMAAX and CGJIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMAAXCGJIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.64%

-31.18%

-11.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-11.15%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.26%

-21.90%

+10.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.55%

-31.18%

+8.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.42%

-31.18%

+6.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-4.54%

+3.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.52%

-5.43%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

2.97%

-1.25%

Volatility

CMAAX vs. CGJIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Moderate Allocation Fund (CMAAX) is 2.64%, while Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that CMAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGJIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMAAXCGJIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

4.58%

-1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.07%

12.06%

-3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.59%

14.94%

-5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.08%

19.99%

-8.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.09%

20.08%

-8.99%

CMAAX vs. CGJIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMAAX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CGJIX's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMAAX vs. CGJIX - Dividend Comparison

CMAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than CGJIX's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund
2.84%3.05%2.04%0.53%0.51%1.85%1.76%1.64%5.72%2.19%1.13%0.00%
CMAAX
Calvert Moderate Allocation Fund
4.30%4.55%2.99%6.69%1.82%4.24%4.18%4.35%5.88%2.71%5.05%12.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, CMAAX and CGJIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CGJIX has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to CMAAX (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMAAX dropped -42.64% vs CGJIX's -31.18%.

CMAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMAAX and CGJIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer