PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGJIX vs. CMEUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGJIX vs. CMEUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) and Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CGJIX having a 10.07% return and CMEUX slightly lower at 9.97%.


CGJIX

1D
1.42%
1M
0.85%
YTD
10.07%
6M
9.54%
1Y
26.67%
3Y*
21.02%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
17.76%

CMEUX

1D
1.25%
1M
0.30%
YTD
9.97%
6M
9.52%
1Y
28.14%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
13.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGJIX vs. CMEUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CGJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund
10.07%14.56%27.74%36.66%-26.84%26.13%38.69%13.37%
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
9.97%18.38%24.94%29.09%-20.29%26.65%29.12%12.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CGJIX and CMEUX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2019

0.96

The correlation between CGJIX and CMEUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGJIX vs. CMEUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGJIX
CGJIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CGJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CGJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

CMEUX
CMEUX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CMEUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMEUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMEUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CMEUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMEUX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGJIX vs. CMEUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) and Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGJIXCMEUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.95

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.78

12.56

-2.78

CGJIX vs. CMEUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGJIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the CMEUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGJIX and CMEUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGJIX vs. CMEUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGJIX drawdown since its inception was -31.18%, which is greater than CMEUX's maximum drawdown of -28.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGJIX and CMEUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGJIXCMEUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.18%

-28.39%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-9.51%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

-19.91%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.18%

-25.61%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-1.88%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-5.32%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.23%

+0.45%

Volatility

CGJIX vs. CMEUX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) at 5.14%. This indicates that CGJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMEUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGJIXCMEUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

5.14%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.40%

10.28%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.16%

12.93%

+1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.89%

18.05%

+1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.08%

19.97%

+0.11%

CGJIX vs. CMEUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGJIX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than CMEUX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CGJIX vs. CMEUX - Dividend Comparison

CGJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than CMEUX's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CGJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund
2.77%3.05%2.04%0.53%0.51%1.85%1.76%1.64%5.72%2.19%1.13%
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
0.92%1.01%1.02%1.16%1.52%4.12%3.33%1.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, CGJIX and CMEUX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CGJIX has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to CMEUX (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGJIX dropped -31.18% vs CMEUX's -28.39%.

CMEUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGJIX and CMEUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer