PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGJIX vs. CISIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGJIX vs. CISIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGJIX achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly lower than CISIX's 11.28% return. Over the past 10 years, CGJIX has outperformed CISIX with an annualized return of 16.80%, while CISIX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.04% annualized return.


CGJIX

1D
2.47%
1M
-1.39%
6M
7.29%
YTD
7.25%
1Y
16.78%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
16.80%
ALL TIME*
16.60%

CISIX

1D
1.91%
1M
-0.64%
6M
10.06%
YTD
11.28%
1Y
22.69%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
11.44%
10Y*
15.04%
ALL TIME*
7.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CGJIX vs. CISIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund
7.25%14.56%27.74%36.66%-26.84%26.13%38.69%35.29%0.74%27.39%
CISIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund
11.28%15.90%24.14%27.27%-21.68%25.63%26.12%32.81%-4.08%21.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CGJIX and CISIX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.97

The correlation between CGJIX and CISIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGJIX vs. CISIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CGJIX
CGJIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CGJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CGJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CISIX
CISIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
CISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CGJIX vs. CISIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CGJIXCISIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.26

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

2.05

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.75

9.05

-4.30

CGJIX vs. CISIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGJIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the CISIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGJIX and CISIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CGJIX vs. CISIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGJIX drawdown since its inception was -31.18%, smaller than the maximum CISIX drawdown of -59.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGJIX and CISIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGJIXCISIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.18%

-59.36%

+28.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-9.72%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

-19.94%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.18%

-27.37%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.18%

-32.82%

+1.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.54%

-1.61%

-2.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-14.21%

+8.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

2.21%

+0.76%

Volatility

CGJIX vs. CISIX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX) at 3.68%. This indicates that CGJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CISIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGJIXCISIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

3.68%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

10.82%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.94%

13.54%

+1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.99%

17.92%

+2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.08%

18.57%

+1.51%

CGJIX vs. CISIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CGJIX and CISIX have an expense ratio of 0.24%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CGJIX vs. CISIX - Dividend Comparison

CGJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than CISIX's 4.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund
2.84%3.05%2.04%0.53%0.51%1.85%1.76%1.64%5.72%2.19%1.13%0.00%
CISIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund
4.84%5.39%1.77%1.02%1.17%1.02%0.94%1.14%4.33%2.41%3.77%7.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, CGJIX and CISIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CGJIX has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to CISIX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGJIX dropped -31.18% vs CISIX's -59.36%.

CISIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGJIX and CISIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer