CM.TO vs. EFR.TO
CM.TO (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce) and EFR.TO (Energy Fuels Inc.) are both stocks. CM.TO operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while EFR.TO operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 10 years, CM.TO returned 21.34%/yr vs 21.00%/yr for EFR.TO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CM.TO vs. EFR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CM.TO achieves a 28.60% return, which is significantly higher than EFR.TO's 5.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CM.TO having a 21.34% annualized return and EFR.TO not far behind at 21.00%.
CM.TO
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 28.60%
- 6M
- 26.24%
- 1Y
- 76.96%
- 3Y*
- 47.25%
- 5Y*
- 23.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.34%
EFR.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -24.06%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 187.96%
- 3Y*
- 34.35%
- 5Y*
- 19.77%
- 10Y*
- 21.00%
CM.TO vs. EFR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM.TO Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 28.60% | 42.31% | 49.56% | 23.83% | -20.89% | 47.75% | 13.88% | 18.19% | -8.64% | 22.50% |
EFR.TO Energy Fuels Inc. | 5.89% | 169.01% | -22.21% | 13.37% | -13.25% | 78.89% | 117.74% | -35.92% | 71.24% | 2.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CM.TO and EFR.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2006 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
CM.TO:
CA$146.70B
EFR.TO:
CA$5.08B
CM.TO:
CA$10.53
EFR.TO:
-$0.30
CM.TO:
2.78
EFR.TO:
41.45
CM.TO:
2.51
EFR.TO:
5.03
CM.TO:
CA$53.25B
EFR.TO:
$84.86M
CM.TO:
CA$28.73B
EFR.TO:
$25.23M
CM.TO:
CA$13.01B
EFR.TO:
-$72.89M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CM.TO vs. EFR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CM.TO
EFR.TO
CM.TO vs. EFR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO) and Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CM.TO | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.30 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.50 | 3.70 | +4.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.13 | 7.20 | +23.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CM.TO vs. EFR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CM.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.49%, smaller than the maximum EFR.TO drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CM.TO and EFR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CM.TO | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.49% | -99.57% | +41.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -51.09% | +41.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -59.28% | +42.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.43% | -64.59% | +29.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.02% | -78.32% | +38.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -92.13% | +90.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -91.43% | +82.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 26.24% | -23.76% |
Volatility
CM.TO vs. EFR.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO) is 7.93%, while Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) has a volatility of 29.13%. This indicates that CM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CM.TO | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.93% | 29.13% | -21.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.93% | 66.37% | -51.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.59% | 97.73% | -80.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 71.77% | -53.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.92% | 70.81% | -50.89% |
Dividends
CM.TO vs. EFR.TO - Dividend Comparison
CM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, while EFR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM.TO Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 2.57% | 3.20% | 4.04% | 5.47% | 7.52% | 8.13% | 10.74% | 10.51% | 10.58% | 8.39% | 8.84% | 9.69% |
EFR.TO Energy Fuels Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CM.TO vs. EFR.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Energy Fuels Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CM.TO vs. EFR.TO - Profitability Comparison
CM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a gross profit of 7.36B and revenue of 15.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.
EFR.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.36M and revenue of 35.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.1%.
CM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported an operating income of 3.20B and revenue of 15.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
EFR.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported an operating income of -14.55M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -40.6%.
CM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 15.23B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.
EFR.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Fuels Inc. reported a net income of -10.84M and revenue of 35.84M, resulting in a net margin of -30.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CM.TO and EFR.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CM.TO and EFR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer