CLTAX vs. MBXIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund (CLTAX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX).
CLTAX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Jul 1, 2012. MBXIX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Dec 31, 1996.
Performance
CLTAX vs. MBXIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CLTAX vs. MBXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLTAX Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund | -5.68% | 15.26% | 3.51% | 10.16% | -24.36% | 17.82% | 27.88% | 2.80% | -4.99% | 16.74% |
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I | 8.00% | 4.35% | 13.49% | -0.67% | 7.72% | 16.89% | -0.45% | 13.83% | -2.16% | 13.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLTAX achieves a -5.68% return, which is significantly lower than MBXIX's 8.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CLTAX has underperformed MBXIX with an annualized return of 5.60%, while MBXIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.26% annualized return.
CLTAX
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- -10.37%
- YTD
- -5.68%
- 6M
- -3.98%
- 1Y
- 10.92%
- 3Y*
- 6.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- 5.60%
MBXIX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 14.74%
- 3Y*
- 9.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CLTAX vs. MBXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLTAX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXIX's 2.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CLTAX vs. MBXIX — Risk / Return Rank
CLTAX
MBXIX
CLTAX vs. MBXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund (CLTAX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLTAX | MBXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 1.33 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 1.78 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.31 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 1.25 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.40 | 5.92 | -2.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLTAX | MBXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.33 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.71 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.62 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.66 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between CLTAX and MBXIX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CLTAX vs. MBXIX - Dividend Comparison
CLTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.67%, while MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLTAX Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund | 10.67% | 10.06% | 0.02% | 1.02% | 12.48% | 0.55% | 3.42% | 12.17% | 2.73% | 2.81% | 1.35% | 6.33% |
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.63% | 2.25% | 7.74% | 0.00% | 4.27% | 5.18% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 1.91% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CLTAX vs. MBXIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLTAX drawdown since its inception was -28.93%, smaller than the maximum MBXIX drawdown of -31.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLTAX and MBXIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLTAX | MBXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.93% | -31.73% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -11.28% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.92% | -15.59% | -11.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.93% | -31.73% | +2.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.91% | -1.64% | -9.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.10% | -4.06% | -4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 2.39% | +0.34% |
Volatility
CLTAX vs. MBXIX - Volatility Comparison
Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund (CLTAX) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) at 2.37%. This indicates that CLTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CLTAX | MBXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 2.37% | +3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.76% | 5.27% | +7.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.09% | 11.80% | +7.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 11.76% | +2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.18% | 13.45% | +0.73% |