CLTAX vs. MBXAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CLTAX (Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund) and MBXAX (Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - CLTAX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds, while MBXAX is a Macro Trading fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, CLTAX returned 8.10%/yr vs 8.59%/yr for MBXAX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLTAX charges 1.53%/yr vs 2.18%/yr for MBXAX.

Performance

CLTAX vs. MBXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund (CLTAX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLTAX achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly lower than MBXAX's 14.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CLTAX has underperformed MBXAX with an annualized return of 8.10%, while MBXAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.59% annualized return.

CLTAX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 2.83%
• YTD: 12.24%
• 6M: 10.15%
• 1Y: 25.39%
• 3Y*: 13.05%
• 5Y*: 3.65%
• 10Y*: 8.10%

MBXAX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 1.21%
• YTD: 14.91%
• 6M: 14.05%
• 1Y: 19.80%
• 3Y*: 11.80%
• 5Y*: 7.45%
• 10Y*: 8.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLTAX vs. MBXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CLTAX Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund	12.24%	15.26%	3.51%	10.16%	-24.36%	17.82%	27.88%	2.80%	-4.99%	16.74%
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund	14.91%	4.13%	13.17%	-0.91%	7.46%	16.62%	-0.72%	13.59%	-2.43%	13.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CLTAX and MBXAX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.45

The correlation between CLTAX and MBXAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (5 years) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CLTAX vs. MBXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLTAX

CLTAX Risk / Return Rank: 42
CLTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
CLTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CLTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
CLTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
CLTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

MBXAX

MBXAX Risk / Return Rank: 91
MBXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
MBXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MBXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
MBXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
MBXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLTAX vs. MBXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund (CLTAX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLTAX	MBXAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	2.82	-1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	4.14	-1.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.54	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	5.01	-2.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.98	19.43	-8.45

CLTAX vs. MBXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLTAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the MBXAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLTAX and MBXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLTAX vs. MBXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLTAX drawdown since its inception was -28.93%, smaller than the maximum MBXAX drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLTAX and MBXAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLTAX	MBXAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.93%	-31.75%	+2.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.91%	-3.89%	-7.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.53%	-15.66%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.92%	-15.66%	-11.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.93%	-31.75%	+2.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	0.00%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.99%	-4.03%	-3.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	1.00%	+1.41%

Volatility

CLTAX vs. MBXAX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund (CLTAX) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) at 1.55%. This indicates that CLTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLTAX	MBXAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.86%	1.55%	+3.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.08%	5.16%	+7.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.30%	6.93%	+9.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.75%	11.49%	+3.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.36%	13.41%	+0.95%

CLTAX vs. MBXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLTAX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXAX's 2.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLTAX vs. MBXAX - Dividend Comparison

CLTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.96%, while MBXAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLTAX Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund	8.96%	10.06%	0.02%	1.02%	12.48%	0.55%	3.42%	12.17%	2.73%	2.81%	1.35%	6.33%
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund	0.00%	0.00%	2.43%	2.02%	7.57%	0.00%	3.92%	4.96%	3.07%	3.35%	1.82%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLTAX and MBXAX in my portfolio?

CLTAX and MBXAX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLTAX or MBXAX?

CLTAX has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to MBXAX (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLTAX dropped -28.93% vs MBXAX's -31.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MBXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.