CLSZ vs. FIAT

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CLSZ (Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF) and FIAT (YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLSZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK), while FIAT is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. CLSZ is passively managed, while FIAT is actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLSZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for FIAT.

Performance

CLSZ vs. FIAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CLSZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 13.47%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FIAT

• 1D: 3.97%
• 1M: 18.03%
• YTD: 25.08%
• 6M: 30.07%
• 1Y: 51.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSZ vs. FIAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF	-82.67%
FIAT YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSZ and FIAT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	0.55

Return for Risk

CLSZ vs. FIAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FIAT

FIAT Risk / Return Rank: 30
FIAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
FIAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FIAT Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FIAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FIAT Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSZ vs. FIAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLSZ	FIAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.97	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.46	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.20	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.50	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.27	—

Drawdowns

CLSZ vs. FIAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSZ drawdown since its inception was -87.62%, which is greater than FIAT's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSZ and FIAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSZ	FIAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.62%	-70.50%	-17.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-82.67%	-46.09%	-36.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.69%	-45.40%	-8.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	15.74%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLSZ	FIAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	43.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	139.63%	52.81%	+86.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	139.63%	60.24%	+79.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	139.63%	60.24%	+79.39%

CLSZ vs. FIAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FIAT's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLSZ vs. FIAT - Dividend Comparison

CLSZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 95.94%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FIAT YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	95.94%	178.11%	70.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLSZ and FIAT in my portfolio?

CLSZ and FIAT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLSZ or FIAT?

On fees, FIAT is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLSZ or FIAT?

FIAT is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for CLSZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLSZ or FIAT?

FIAT has the higher dividend yield at 95.94%, compared with 0.00% for CLSZ.

What is the main difference between CLSZ and FIAT?

CLSZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while FIAT is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CLSZ and 0.99% for FIAT.