CLSX vs. QTAP

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CLSX (Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLSX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.

Performance

CLSX vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSX achieves a 60.09% return, which is significantly higher than QTAP's 12.75% return.

CLSX

• 1D: -11.28%
• 1M: -2.59%
• YTD: 60.09%
• 6M: 24.58%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTAP

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: 12.75%
• 6M: 12.65%
• 1Y: 21.29%
• 3Y*: 19.75%
• 5Y*: 12.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSX vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLSX Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF	60.09%	-35.55%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	12.75%	2.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSX and QTAP is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

CLSX vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSX vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLSX	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.54	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.75	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.89	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	8.59	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	48.57	—

Drawdowns

CLSX vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSX drawdown since its inception was -93.16%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSX and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSX	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.16%	-29.44%	-63.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.49%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.32%	-1.77%	-75.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.47%	-4.99%	-64.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.44%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLSX	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.03%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	190.49%	6.09%	+184.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	190.49%	18.92%	+171.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	190.49%	18.71%	+171.78%

CLSX vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLSX vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLSX nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLSX and QTAP in my portfolio?

CLSX and QTAP have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLSX or QTAP?

On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLSX or QTAP?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CLSX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLSX or QTAP?

CLSX and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CLSX and QTAP?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CLSX and 0.79% for QTAP.