CLSPX vs. CTCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX).
CLSPX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 20, 1985. CTCAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 9, 2000.
Performance
CLSPX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CLSPX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSPX Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund | -7.47% | 15.16% | 23.97% | 25.25% | -31.25% | 16.39% | 35.43% | 35.25% | -5.22% | 22.86% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | -10.22% | 24.78% | 31.39% | 56.46% | -34.81% | 22.73% | 49.46% | 43.91% | -1.48% | 42.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLSPX achieves a -7.47% return, which is significantly higher than CTCAX's -10.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CLSPX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 11.32%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.26% annualized return.
CLSPX
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -11.48%
- YTD
- -7.47%
- 6M
- -10.69%
- 1Y
- 18.53%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 5.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
CTCAX
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- YTD
- -10.22%
- 6M
- -8.54%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- 20.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CLSPX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLSPX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CLSPX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank
CLSPX
CTCAX
CLSPX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLSPX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 1.02 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 1.57 | -0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.22 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 1.67 | -0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 5.92 | -2.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLSPX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 1.02 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.49 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.82 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.70 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSPX and CTCAX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CLSPX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison
CLSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.96%, more than CTCAX's 3.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSPX Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund | 12.96% | 11.99% | 12.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 21.10% | 15.38% | 8.30% | 26.41% | 13.16% | 6.15% | 17.11% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 3.66% | 3.29% | 1.08% | 2.36% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 0.91% | 2.55% | 5.82% | 3.52% | 0.36% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
CLSPX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLSPX drawdown since its inception was -68.54%, which is greater than CTCAX's maximum drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSPX and CTCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSPX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.54% | -61.04% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -14.43% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.35% | -39.55% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.35% | -39.55% | -3.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.64% | -14.43% | +0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.30% | -10.75% | -5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 4.07% | 0.00% |
Volatility
CLSPX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) has a higher volatility of 8.39% compared to Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) at 7.45%. This indicates that CLSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CLSPX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.39% | 7.45% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.39% | 16.24% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.56% | 27.00% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 25.81% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.64% | 24.66% | -2.02% |