CLSPX vs. KMKAX
CLSPX (Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund) and KMKAX (Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CLSPX returned 14.72%/yr vs 18.90%/yr for KMKAX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLSPX charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.65%/yr for KMKAX.
Performance
CLSPX vs. KMKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLSPX achieves a 21.27% return, which is significantly higher than KMKAX's 6.59% return. Over the past 10 years, CLSPX has underperformed KMKAX with an annualized return of 14.72%, while KMKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.90% annualized return.
CLSPX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 21.27%
- 6M
- 18.50%
- 1Y
- 28.85%
- 3Y*
- 23.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 14.72%
KMKAX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -9.76%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- -1.60%
- 3Y*
- 31.26%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- 18.90%
CLSPX vs. KMKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSPX Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund | 21.27% | 15.16% | 23.97% | 25.25% | -31.25% | 16.39% | 35.43% | 35.25% | -5.22% | 22.86% |
KMKAX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund | 6.59% | -3.31% | 83.58% | -7.57% | 14.69% | 27.69% | 19.31% | 22.42% | -10.92% | 46.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSPX and KMKAX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2006 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CLSPX and KMKAX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLSPX vs. KMKAX — Risk / Return Rank
CLSPX
KMKAX
CLSPX vs. KMKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund (KMKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLSPX | KMKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.00 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | -0.13 | +2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.68 | -0.32 | +8.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLSPX vs. KMKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLSPX drawdown since its inception was -68.54%, roughly equal to the maximum KMKAX drawdown of -65.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSPX and KMKAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSPX | KMKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.54% | -65.57% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -20.20% | +6.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -28.45% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.35% | -31.56% | -11.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.35% | -31.56% | -11.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -22.04% | +22.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.22% | -15.52% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 7.89% | -4.01% |
Volatility
CLSPX vs. KMKAX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund (KMKAX) at 7.01%. This indicates that CLSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLSPX | KMKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | 7.01% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.82% | 19.59% | -1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.12% | 23.85% | -1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.20% | 26.50% | -1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 23.71% | -0.78% |
CLSPX vs. KMKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLSPX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than KMKAX's 1.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLSPX vs. KMKAX - Dividend Comparison
CLSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.89%, more than KMKAX's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSPX Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund | 9.89% | 11.99% | 12.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 21.10% | 15.38% | 8.30% | 26.41% | 13.16% | 6.15% | 17.11% |
KMKAX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund | 0.57% | 0.61% | 0.66% | 0.69% | 1.19% | 1.29% | 0.02% | 0.07% | 9.28% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLSPX and KMKAX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLSPX has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to KMKAX (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLSPX dropped -68.54% vs KMKAX's -65.57%.
CLSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLSPX and KMKAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer