CLSM vs. TRTY

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CLSM (Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF) and TRTY (Cambria Trinity ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds - CLSM tracks the Actively Managed while TRTY tracks the Cambria Trinity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CLSM returned 13.89%/yr vs 12.01%/yr for TRTY. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLSM charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TRTY.

Performance

CLSM vs. TRTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) and Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSM achieves a 20.91% return, which is significantly higher than TRTY's 10.56% return.

CLSM

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 9.14%
• YTD: 20.91%
• 6M: 20.97%
• 1Y: 35.30%
• 3Y*: 13.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRTY

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: 10.56%
• 6M: 12.12%
• 1Y: 24.27%
• 3Y*: 12.01%
• 5Y*: 6.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSM vs. TRTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	20.91%	15.32%	1.87%	3.78%	-23.23%	9.10%
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF	10.56%	16.35%	3.89%	3.97%	-3.30%	1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSM and TRTY is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021	0.55

The correlation between CLSM and TRTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CLSM vs. TRTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CLSM	TRTY
Technology	51.8%	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	34.8%	3.8%
Communication Services	5.5%	3.9%
Consumer Cyclical	4.4%	7.9%
Healthcare	1.4%	2.6%
Industrials	1.0%	13.4%
Utilities	0.5%	6.9%
Basic Materials	0.4%	11.1%
Energy	0.2%	18.2%
Financial Services	0.1%	15.8%
Real Estate	0.0%	8.7%

Return for Risk

CLSM vs. TRTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSM

CLSM Risk / Return Rank: 82
CLSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
CLSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CLSM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CLSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
CLSM Martin Ratio Rank: 84

TRTY

TRTY Risk / Return Rank: 80
TRTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
TRTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
TRTY Omega Ratio Rank: 84
TRTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
TRTY Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSM vs. TRTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) and Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLSM	TRTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	2.56	+0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	3.23	+0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.52	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.25	4.55	-0.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.62	18.83	-1.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLSM vs. TRTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSM Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the TRTY Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSM and TRTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLSM	TRTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79	2.56	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.62	-0.26

Drawdowns

CLSM vs. TRTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSM drawdown since its inception was -27.77%, which is greater than TRTY's maximum drawdown of -22.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSM and TRTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSM	TRTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.77%	-22.35%	-5.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	-5.49%	-3.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.60%	-9.25%	-5.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.21%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.50%	-4.17%	-12.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	1.32%	+0.73%

Volatility

CLSM vs. TRTY - Volatility Comparison

Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) at 2.34%. This indicates that CLSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLSM	TRTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	2.34%	+1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.58%	8.24%	+2.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.70%	9.54%	+3.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.47%	10.62%	+1.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.47%	10.41%	+2.06%

CLSM vs. TRTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSM has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than TRTY's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLSM vs. TRTY - Dividend Comparison

CLSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than TRTY's 2.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	0.74%	0.90%	2.13%	2.58%	3.17%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF	2.99%	2.86%	3.55%	3.24%	5.17%	4.52%	1.99%	2.64%	1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLSM and TRTY in my portfolio?

CLSM and TRTY have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLSM or TRTY?

CLSM has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to TRTY (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLSM dropped -27.77% vs TRTY's -22.35%.

Which ETF is better, CLSM or TRTY?

On 3-year performance, CLSM leads with 13.89% vs 12.01% for TRTY. On fees, TRTY is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, TRTY has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLSM or TRTY?

Over the 3-year period, CLSM has performed better with a 13.89% return vs 12.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLSM or TRTY?

TRTY is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for CLSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLSM or TRTY?

TRTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 0.74% for CLSM.

What is the main difference between CLSM and TRTY?

CLSM tracks Actively Managed, while TRTY tracks Cambria Trinity Index. They also come from different issuers: Cabana and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for CLSM and 0.44% for TRTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.