CLSM vs. SFTX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CLSM (Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF) and SFTX (Horizon International Managed Risk ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. CLSM is passively managed, while SFTX is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.82% expense ratio.

Performance

CLSM vs. SFTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) and Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSM achieves a 20.91% return, which is significantly lower than SFTX's 22.61% return.

CLSM

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 9.14%
• YTD: 20.91%
• 6M: 20.97%
• 1Y: 35.30%
• 3Y*: 13.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SFTX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 7.50%
• YTD: 22.61%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSM vs. SFTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	20.91%	-0.22%
SFTX Horizon International Managed Risk ETF	22.61%	1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSM and SFTX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025	0.84

CLSM vs. SFTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CLSM	SFTX
Technology	51.8%	28.2%
Consumer Defensive	34.8%	3.7%
Communication Services	5.5%	4.5%
Consumer Cyclical	4.4%	5.9%
Healthcare	1.4%	10.1%
Industrials	1.0%	12.1%
Utilities	0.5%	1.9%
Basic Materials	0.4%	8.6%
Energy	0.2%	8.0%
Financial Services	0.1%	16.2%
Real Estate	0.0%	0.9%

Return for Risk

CLSM vs. SFTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSM

CLSM Risk / Return Rank: 82
CLSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
CLSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CLSM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CLSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
CLSM Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSM vs. SFTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) and Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLSM	SFTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.25	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.62	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLSM	SFTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	2.63	-2.27

Drawdowns

CLSM vs. SFTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSM drawdown since its inception was -27.77%, which is greater than SFTX's maximum drawdown of -12.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSM and SFTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSM	SFTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.77%	-12.75%	-15.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.50%	-2.80%	-13.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLSM	SFTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.58%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.70%	21.72%	-9.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.47%	21.72%	-9.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.47%	21.72%	-9.25%

CLSM vs. SFTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CLSM and SFTX have an expense ratio of 0.82%.

Dividends

CLSM vs. SFTX - Dividend Comparison

CLSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than SFTX's 0.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	0.74%	0.90%	2.13%	2.58%	3.17%	0.59%
SFTX Horizon International Managed Risk ETF	0.20%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLSM and SFTX in my portfolio?

CLSM and SFTX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLSM or SFTX?

Both ETFs have the same 0.82% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLSM or SFTX?

CLSM and SFTX have the same expense ratio: 0.82% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLSM or SFTX?

CLSM has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.20% for SFTX.

What is the main difference between CLSM and SFTX?

They also come from different issuers: Cabana and Horizon.