PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLSM vs. CTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLSM vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSM achieves a 20.91% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 22.34% return.


CLSM

1D
0.55%
1M
9.14%
YTD
20.91%
6M
20.97%
1Y
35.30%
3Y*
13.89%
5Y*
10Y*

CTAP

1D
0.68%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
22.34%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSM vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CLSM and CTAP is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

0.24

CLSM vs. CTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CLSM
CTAP

Technology

51.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

34.8%

-

Communication Services

5.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%

-

Healthcare

1.4%

-

Industrials

1.0%

-

Utilities

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

0.4%

-

Energy

0.2%

-

Financial Services

0.1%
49.3%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Technology

CLSM
51.8%
CTAP

-

Consumer Defensive

CLSM
34.8%
CTAP

-

Communication Services

CLSM
5.5%
CTAP

-

Consumer Cyclical

CLSM
4.4%
CTAP

-

Healthcare

CLSM
1.4%
CTAP

-

Industrials

CLSM
1.0%
CTAP

-

Utilities

CLSM
0.5%
CTAP

-

Basic Materials

CLSM
0.4%
CTAP

-

Energy

CLSM
0.2%
CTAP

-

Financial Services

CLSM
0.1%
CTAP
49.3%

Real Estate

CLSM
0.0%
CTAP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLSM vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSM
CLSM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CLSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

CTAP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSM vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLSMCTAPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.62

CLSM vs. CTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLSMCTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

2.56

-2.21

Drawdowns

CLSM vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSM drawdown since its inception was -27.77%, which is greater than CTAP's maximum drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSM and CTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSMCTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.77%

-9.02%

-18.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.16%

+4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.50%

-2.16%

-14.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

Volatility

CLSM vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSMCTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.70%

24.03%

-11.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.47%

24.03%

-11.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.47%

24.03%

-11.56%

CLSM vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSM has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLSM vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison

CLSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than CTAP's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CLSM
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF
0.74%0.90%2.13%2.58%3.17%0.59%
CTAP
Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF
0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLSM and CTAP have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for CLSM.

CLSM has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.64% for CTAP.

CLSM is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while CTAP is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Cabana and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for CLSM and 0.10% for CTAP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLSM and CTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer