CLSM vs. CTAP
CLSM (Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF) and CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLSM is a Tactical Allocation fund tracking the Actively Managed, while CTAP is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Simplify. CLSM is passively managed, while CTAP is actively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLSM charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CTAP.
Performance
CLSM vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLSM achieves a 20.91% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 22.34% return.
CLSM
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 9.14%
- YTD
- 20.91%
- 6M
- 20.97%
- 1Y
- 35.30%
- 3Y*
- 13.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTAP
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 22.34%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLSM vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF | 20.91% | -0.47% |
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 22.34% | 2.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSM and CTAP is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.24 |
CLSM vs. CTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CLSM
CTAP
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
CLSM
CTAP
-
Consumer Defensive
CLSM
CTAP
-
Communication Services
CLSM
CTAP
-
Consumer Cyclical
CLSM
CTAP
-
Healthcare
CLSM
CTAP
-
Industrials
CLSM
CTAP
-
Utilities
CLSM
CTAP
-
Basic Materials
CLSM
CTAP
-
Energy
CLSM
CTAP
-
Financial Services
CLSM
CTAP
Real Estate
CLSM
CTAP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLSM vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank
CLSM
CTAP
CLSM vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLSM | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.79 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.68 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.62 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLSM | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 2.56 | -2.21 |
Drawdowns
CLSM vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLSM drawdown since its inception was -27.77%, which is greater than CTAP's maximum drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSM and CTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSM | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.77% | -9.02% | -18.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.16% | +4.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.50% | -2.16% | -14.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | — | — |
Volatility
CLSM vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLSM | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.70% | 24.03% | -11.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.47% | 24.03% | -11.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.47% | 24.03% | -11.56% |
CLSM vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLSM has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLSM vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison
CLSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than CTAP's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF | 0.74% | 0.90% | 2.13% | 2.58% | 3.17% | 0.59% |
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLSM and CTAP have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for CLSM.
CLSM has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.64% for CTAP.
CLSM is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while CTAP is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Cabana and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for CLSM and 0.10% for CTAP.
Find the right allocation for CLSM and CTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer