PortfoliosLab logo
CLSK vs. BITF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CLSK and BITF is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CLSK vs. BITF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLSK:

-0.41

BITF:

-0.38

Sortino Ratio

CLSK:

0.05

BITF:

0.14

Omega Ratio

CLSK:

1.00

BITF:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

CLSK:

-0.41

BITF:

-0.31

Martin Ratio

CLSK:

-0.85

BITF:

-0.64

Ulcer Index

CLSK:

43.83%

BITF:

44.93%

Daily Std Dev

CLSK:

100.74%

BITF:

91.60%

Max Drawdown

CLSK:

-98.56%

BITF:

-95.72%

Current Drawdown

CLSK:

-86.52%

BITF:

-87.03%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLSK:

$2.75B

BITF:

$639.36M

EPS

CLSK:

-$1.11

BITF:

-$0.13

PS Ratio

CLSK:

5.11

BITF:

3.05

PB Ratio

CLSK:

1.45

BITF:

1.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLSK:

$537.40M

BITF:

$198.73M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLSK:

$216.54M

BITF:

-$20.29M

EBITDA (TTM)

CLSK:

$45.48M

BITF:

$46.39M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSK achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly higher than BITF's -22.82% return.


CLSK

YTD

6.19%

1M

30.23%

6M

-30.29%

1Y

-38.99%

5Y*

41.01%

10Y*

N/A

BITF

YTD

-22.82%

1M

37.61%

6M

-48.89%

1Y

-34.29%

5Y*

23.07%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLSK vs. BITF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLSK is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLSK is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLSK is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLSK is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLSK is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLSK is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

BITF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BITF is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BITF is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BITF is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BITF is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BITF is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BITF is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLSK vs. BITF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CLSK Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is comparable to the BITF Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSK and BITF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CLSK vs. BITF - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLSK nor BITF has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.26%
BITF
Bitfarms Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CLSK vs. BITF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSK drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, roughly equal to the maximum BITF drawdown of -95.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSK and BITF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CLSK vs. BITF - Volatility Comparison

CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) has a higher volatility of 24.04% compared to Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF) at 19.13%. This indicates that CLSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CLSK vs. BITF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CleanSpark, Inc. and Bitfarms Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20212022202320242025
181.71M
56.16M
(CLSK) Total Revenue
(BITF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CLSK vs. BITF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CleanSpark, Inc. and Bitfarms Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
53.0%
2.5%
(CLSK) Gross Margin
(BITF) Gross Margin
CLSK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CleanSpark, Inc. reported a gross profit of 96.29M and revenue of 181.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.

BITF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bitfarms Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.39M and revenue of 56.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 2.5%.

CLSK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CleanSpark, Inc. reported an operating income of -138.02M and revenue of 181.71M, resulting in an operating margin of -76.0%.

BITF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bitfarms Ltd. reported an operating income of -16.39M and revenue of 56.16M, resulting in an operating margin of -29.2%.

CLSK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CleanSpark, Inc. reported a net income of -138.79M and revenue of 181.71M, resulting in a net margin of -76.4%.

BITF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bitfarms Ltd. reported a net income of 15.17M and revenue of 56.16M, resulting in a net margin of 27.0%.