PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLSK vs. BITF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CLSK and BITF is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

CLSK vs. BITF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-34.39%
-37.45%
CLSK
BITF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLSK:

0.18

BITF:

-0.34

Sortino Ratio

CLSK:

1.24

BITF:

0.07

Omega Ratio

CLSK:

1.13

BITF:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

CLSK:

0.23

BITF:

-0.38

Martin Ratio

CLSK:

0.54

BITF:

-0.81

Ulcer Index

CLSK:

39.12%

BITF:

38.74%

Daily Std Dev

CLSK:

115.73%

BITF:

92.83%

Max Drawdown

CLSK:

-98.56%

BITF:

-95.72%

Current Drawdown

CLSK:

-84.56%

BITF:

-81.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLSK:

$3.14B

BITF:

$789.16M

EPS

CLSK:

-$0.69

BITF:

-$0.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLSK:

$305.18M

BITF:

$136.49M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLSK:

$77.60M

BITF:

-$33.70M

EBITDA (TTM)

CLSK:

-$35.61M

BITF:

$43.61M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSK achieves a 21.61% return, which is significantly higher than BITF's 12.08% return.


CLSK

YTD

21.61%

1M

-10.26%

6M

-41.27%

1Y

46.41%

5Y*

18.10%

10Y*

N/A

BITF

YTD

12.08%

1M

-20.48%

6M

-43.58%

1Y

-27.71%

5Y*

25.92%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLSK vs. BITF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLSK is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLSK is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLSK is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLSK is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLSK is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLSK is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BITF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BITF is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BITF is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BITF is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BITF is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BITF is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BITF is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLSK vs. BITF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.33-0.34
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.440.07
The chart of Omega ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.151.01
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 0.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.45-0.38
The chart of Martin ratio for CLSK, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market-30.00-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.000.96-0.81
CLSK
BITF

The current CLSK Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the BITF Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSK and BITF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.33
-0.34
CLSK
BITF

Dividends

CLSK vs. BITF - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLSK nor BITF has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.26%
BITF
Bitfarms Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CLSK vs. BITF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSK drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, roughly equal to the maximum BITF drawdown of -95.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSK and BITF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-72.09%
-81.17%
CLSK
BITF

Volatility

CLSK vs. BITF - Volatility Comparison

CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Bitfarms Ltd. (BITF) have volatilities of 25.41% and 25.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%45.00%50.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
25.41%
25.25%
CLSK
BITF

Financials

CLSK vs. BITF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CleanSpark, Inc. and Bitfarms Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab