PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLSE vs. USOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLSE vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSE achieves a 25.76% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 62.18% return.


CLSE

1D
0.35%
1M
9.28%
YTD
25.76%
6M
28.57%
1Y
50.91%
3Y*
32.39%
5Y*
10Y*

USOY

1D
1.45%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
62.18%
6M
59.35%
1Y
57.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSE vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
25.76%20.44%10.82%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
62.18%-7.93%7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSE and USOY is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024

-0.05

The correlation between CLSE and USOY shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLSE vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSE
CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

USOY
USOY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSE vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLSEUSOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.35

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.55

4.03

+6.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

39.58

7.74

+31.83

CLSE vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSE Sharpe Ratio is 3.84, which is higher than the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSE and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLSEUSOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.84

1.89

+1.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.59

0.99

+0.60

Drawdowns

CLSE vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSE drawdown since its inception was -16.45%, smaller than the maximum USOY drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSE and USOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSEUSOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.45%

-17.46%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.85%

-14.29%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.11%

+5.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.59%

-6.47%

+2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

7.42%

-6.13%

Volatility

CLSE vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) is 4.31%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 11.62%. This indicates that CLSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSEUSOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

11.62%

-7.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

27.18%

-16.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.32%

30.44%

-17.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

26.13%

-12.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.88%

26.13%

-12.25%

CLSE vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSE has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLSE vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

CLSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than USOY's 54.16% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
0.76%0.95%0.93%1.21%0.85%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
54.16%104.32%48.60%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLSE and USOY have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOY has higher volatility (11.62%) compared to CLSE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLSE dropped -16.45% vs USOY's -17.46%.

On 1-year performance, USOY leads with 57.29% vs 50.91% for CLSE. On fees, USOY is cheaper at 1.22% per year. On volatility, CLSE has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USOY has performed better with a 57.29% return vs 50.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USOY is cheaper with a 1.22% expense ratio, compared with 1.56% for CLSE.

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.16%, compared with 0.76% for CLSE.

CLSE is categorized as Long-Short, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Convergence Investment Partners and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.56% for CLSE and 1.22% for USOY.

CLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLSE and USOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer