CLSE vs. QNZNX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

CLSE (Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF) and QNZNX (AQR Trend Total Return Fund) are both funds - CLSE is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Convergence Investment Partners, while QNZNX is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by AQR Funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CLSE returned 31.32%/yr vs 31.08%/yr for QNZNX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLSE charges 1.56%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for QNZNX.

Performance

CLSE vs. QNZNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSE achieves a 23.02% return, which is significantly higher than QNZNX's 15.72% return.

CLSE

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 1.85%
• YTD: 23.02%
• 6M: 24.70%
• 1Y: 47.52%
• 3Y*: 31.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QNZNX

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: 0.82%
• YTD: 15.72%
• 6M: 17.77%
• 1Y: 36.10%
• 3Y*: 31.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSE vs. QNZNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	23.02%	20.44%	35.54%	17.54%	-6.36%
QNZNX AQR Trend Total Return Fund	15.72%	22.88%	34.96%	22.73%	1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSE and QNZNX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022	0.63

The correlation between CLSE and QNZNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CLSE vs. QNZNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSE

CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 97

QNZNX

QNZNX Risk / Return Rank: 94
QNZNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
QNZNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
QNZNX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QNZNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
QNZNX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSE vs. QNZNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLSE	QNZNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.54	3.30	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.76	4.28	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.59	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.85	7.41	+2.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	36.64	29.90	+6.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLSE vs. QNZNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSE Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is comparable to the QNZNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSE and QNZNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLSE	QNZNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.54	3.30	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.54	1.91	-0.37

Drawdowns

CLSE vs. QNZNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSE drawdown since its inception was -16.45%, smaller than the maximum QNZNX drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSE and QNZNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSE	QNZNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.45%	-18.38%	+1.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.85%	-4.88%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.45%	-13.48%	-2.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.18%	-2.42%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.59%	-2.77%	-0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.31%	1.21%	+0.10%

Volatility

CLSE vs. QNZNX - Volatility Comparison

Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX) at 3.22%. This indicates that CLSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QNZNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLSE	QNZNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.28%	3.22%	+1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.46%	7.45%	+3.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.52%	10.99%	+2.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	12.08%	+1.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.91%	12.08%	+1.83%

CLSE vs. QNZNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSE has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than QNZNX's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLSE vs. QNZNX - Dividend Comparison

CLSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, more than QNZNX's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	0.77%	0.95%	0.93%	1.21%	0.85%
QNZNX AQR Trend Total Return Fund	0.74%	0.86%	16.46%	23.14%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLSE and QNZNX in my portfolio?

CLSE and QNZNX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLSE or QNZNX?

CLSE has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to QNZNX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLSE dropped -16.45% vs QNZNX's -18.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 3.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.