PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLSE vs. EUAD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLSE vs. EUAD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and Select STOXX Europe Aerospace & Defense ETF (EUAD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSE achieves a 24.66% return, which is significantly higher than EUAD's -1.21% return.


CLSE

1D
-0.29%
1M
-0.41%
6M
22.60%
YTD
24.66%
1Y
47.95%
3Y*
29.99%
5Y*
10Y*

EUAD

1D
-2.00%
1M
1.19%
6M
-13.49%
YTD
-1.21%
1Y
-3.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSE vs. EUAD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
24.66%20.44%1.84%
EUAD
Select STOXX Europe Aerospace & Defense ETF
-1.21%74.51%-6.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSE and EUAD is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2024

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLSE vs. EUAD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSE
CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

EUAD
EUAD Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
EUAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUAD Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
EUAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUAD Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSE vs. EUAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and Select STOXX Europe Aerospace & Defense ETF (EUAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLSEEUADDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.01

+0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.94

-0.14

+10.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.91

-0.32

+35.23

CLSE vs. EUAD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSE Sharpe Ratio is 3.51, which is higher than the EUAD Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSE and EUAD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLSE vs. EUAD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSE drawdown since its inception was -16.45%, smaller than the maximum EUAD drawdown of -22.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSE and EUAD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSEEUADDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.45%

-22.04%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.85%

-22.04%

+17.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-13.79%

+12.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-6.16%

+2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

9.94%

-8.56%

Volatility

CLSE vs. EUAD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) is 3.92%, while Select STOXX Europe Aerospace & Defense ETF (EUAD) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that CLSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSEEUADDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

8.24%

-4.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

24.42%

-13.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.76%

29.38%

-15.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

29.74%

-15.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.90%

29.74%

-15.84%

CLSE vs. EUAD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSE has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than EUAD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLSE vs. EUAD - Dividend Comparison

CLSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than EUAD's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
0.76%0.95%0.93%1.21%0.85%
EUAD
Select STOXX Europe Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.41%0.40%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLSE and EUAD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EUAD has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to CLSE (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLSE dropped -16.45% vs EUAD's -22.04%.

On 1-year performance, CLSE leads with 47.95% vs -3.16% for EUAD. On fees, EUAD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CLSE has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CLSE has performed better with a 47.95% return vs -3.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EUAD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CLSE.

CLSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.41% for EUAD.

CLSE is categorized as Long-Short, while EUAD is Aerospace & Defense. They also come from different issuers: Convergence Investment Partners and Select Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.52% for CLSE and 0.50% for EUAD.

CLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLSE and EUAD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer