CLOX vs. HFSP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CLOX (Panagram AAA CLO ETF) and HFSP (TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLOX is a CLO fund actively managed by Panagram, while HFSP is a Long-Short fund actively managed by TradersAI. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CLOX returned 5.25% vs -21.48% for HFSP. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. CLOX charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for HFSP.

Performance

CLOX vs. HFSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) and TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOX achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly higher than HFSP's -8.37% return.

CLOX

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 2.33%
• 6M: 2.50%
• 1Y: 5.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HFSP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.51%
• YTD: -8.37%
• 6M: -8.88%
• 1Y: -21.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOX vs. HFSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CLOX Panagram AAA CLO ETF	2.33%	5.52%	1.45%
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF	-8.37%	-24.01%	0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOX and HFSP is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024	-0.08

Return for Risk

CLOX vs. HFSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOX

CLOX Risk / Return Rank: 97
CLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

HFSP

HFSP Risk / Return Rank: 1
HFSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
HFSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
HFSP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
HFSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HFSP Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOX vs. HFSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) and TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLOX	HFSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.08	-1.20	+5.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.87	-1.55	+8.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.00	0.79	+1.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.00	-0.84	+8.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	41.83	-1.43	+43.26

CLOX vs. HFSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOX Sharpe Ratio is 4.08, which is higher than the HFSP Sharpe Ratio of -1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOX and HFSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLOX vs. HFSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOX drawdown since its inception was -4.13%, smaller than the maximum HFSP drawdown of -34.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOX and HFSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOX	HFSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.13%	-34.84%	+30.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.66%	-25.82%	+25.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-33.96%	+33.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-17.54%	+17.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.13%	15.08%	-14.95%

Volatility

CLOX vs. HFSP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Panagram AAA CLO ETF (CLOX) is 0.39%, while TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that CLOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOX	HFSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.39%	4.52%	-4.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.94%	12.59%	-11.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29%	18.12%	-16.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.30%	24.30%	-21.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.30%	24.30%	-21.00%

CLOX vs. HFSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HFSP's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOX vs. HFSP - Dividend Comparison

CLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, while HFSP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CLOX Panagram AAA CLO ETF	4.97%	5.18%	6.25%	2.90%
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.53%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOX and HFSP in my portfolio?

CLOX and HFSP have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLOX or HFSP?

HFSP has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to CLOX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOX dropped -4.13% vs HFSP's -34.84%.

Which ETF is better, CLOX or HFSP?

On 1-year performance, CLOX leads with 5.25% vs -21.48% for HFSP. On fees, CLOX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CLOX has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLOX or HFSP?

Over the 1-year period, CLOX has performed better with a 5.25% return vs -21.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOX or HFSP?

CLOX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for HFSP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOX or HFSP?

CLOX has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 0.00% for HFSP.

What is the main difference between CLOX and HFSP?

CLOX is categorized as CLO, while HFSP is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Panagram and TradersAI. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CLOX and 1.25% for HFSP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.08 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.