CLOU vs. XT
CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - CLOU tracks the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index while XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CLOU returned 0.30%/yr vs 8.75%/yr for XT. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLOU charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.
Performance
CLOU vs. XT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly lower than XT's 20.78% return.
CLOU
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 21.81%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 13.05%
- 1Y
- 11.58%
- 3Y*
- 10.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.30%
- 10Y*
- —
XT
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 9.89%
- YTD
- 20.78%
- 6M
- 22.09%
- 1Y
- 47.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.75%
CLOU vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 13.35% | -5.59% | 5.74% | 41.36% | -39.56% | -3.27% | 77.18% | 4.79% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 20.78% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 27.02% | -27.83% | 16.43% | 35.10% | 11.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOU and XT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CLOU and XT has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CLOU vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CLOU
XT
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CLOU
XT
Real Estate
CLOU
XT
Communication Services
CLOU
XT
Consumer Cyclical
CLOU
XT
Healthcare
CLOU
XT
Basic Materials
CLOU
-
XT
Consumer Defensive
CLOU
-
XT
Energy
CLOU
-
XT
Financial Services
CLOU
-
XT
Industrials
CLOU
-
XT
Utilities
CLOU
-
XT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOU vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank
CLOU
XT
CLOU vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLOU | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 3.00 | -2.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 3.95 | -3.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.50 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 4.65 | -4.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.09 | 19.56 | -18.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLOU | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 3.00 | -2.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.42 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.66 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
CLOU vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and XT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOU | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.74% | -34.41% | -19.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.24% | -10.45% | -16.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.18% | -22.09% | -11.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.74% | -34.41% | -19.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.82% | 0.00% | -18.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.42% | -7.41% | -17.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.01% | 2.49% | +8.52% |
Volatility
CLOU vs. XT - Volatility Comparison
Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) has a higher volatility of 13.10% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 4.79%. This indicates that CLOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOU | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.10% | 4.79% | +8.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.52% | 11.97% | +12.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.26% | 15.98% | +13.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.53% | 20.76% | +9.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.77% | 20.09% | +10.68% |
CLOU vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLOU vs. XT - Dividend Comparison
CLOU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 6.58% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOU and XT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLOU has higher volatility (13.10%) compared to XT (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs XT's -34.41%.
On 5-year performance, XT leads with 8.75% vs 0.30% for CLOU. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XT has performed better with a 8.75% return vs 0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CLOU.
XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.58%, compared with 0.00% for CLOU.
CLOU tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CLOU and 0.46% for XT.
XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLOU and XT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer