PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOU vs. XT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLOU vs. XT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly lower than XT's 20.78% return.


CLOU

1D
-2.81%
1M
21.81%
YTD
13.35%
6M
13.05%
1Y
11.58%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*

XT

1D
0.59%
1M
9.89%
YTD
20.78%
6M
22.09%
1Y
47.67%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
14.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOU vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CLOU
Global X Cloud Computing ETF
13.35%-5.59%5.74%41.36%-39.56%-3.27%77.18%4.79%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
20.78%26.28%0.29%27.02%-27.83%16.43%35.10%11.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOU and XT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between CLOU and XT has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CLOU vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CLOU
XT

Technology

85.3%
43.5%

Real Estate

5.6%
0.0%

Communication Services

5.5%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
7.9%

Healthcare

0.6%
23.4%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.3%

Financial Services

-

3.3%

Industrials

-

10.1%

Utilities

-

4.6%

Technology

CLOU
85.3%
XT
43.5%

Real Estate

CLOU
5.6%
XT
0.0%

Communication Services

CLOU
5.5%
XT
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CLOU
3.0%
XT
7.9%

Healthcare

CLOU
0.6%
XT
23.4%

Basic Materials

CLOU

-

XT
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

CLOU

-

XT
0.0%

Energy

CLOU

-

XT
0.3%

Financial Services

CLOU

-

XT
3.3%

Industrials

CLOU

-

XT
10.1%

Utilities

CLOU

-

XT
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLOU vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOU
CLOU Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CLOU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOU Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOU Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

XT
XT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOU vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLOUXTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.40

3.00

-2.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.75

3.95

-3.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.50

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

4.65

-4.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.09

19.56

-18.47

CLOU vs. XT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOU Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the XT Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOU and XT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLOUXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

3.00

-2.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.42

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.66

-0.40

Drawdowns

CLOU vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and XT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOUXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.74%

-34.41%

-19.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.24%

-10.45%

-16.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.18%

-22.09%

-11.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.74%

-34.41%

-19.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.82%

0.00%

-18.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.42%

-7.41%

-17.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.01%

2.49%

+8.52%

Volatility

CLOU vs. XT - Volatility Comparison

Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) has a higher volatility of 13.10% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 4.79%. This indicates that CLOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLOUXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.10%

4.79%

+8.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.52%

11.97%

+12.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.26%

15.98%

+13.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.53%

20.76%

+9.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.77%

20.09%

+10.68%

CLOU vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLOU vs. XT - Dividend Comparison

CLOU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLOU
Global X Cloud Computing ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.76%0.00%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
6.58%7.95%0.66%0.41%0.78%0.84%0.77%1.55%1.40%0.97%1.37%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLOU and XT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLOU has higher volatility (13.10%) compared to XT (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs XT's -34.41%.

On 5-year performance, XT leads with 8.75% vs 0.30% for CLOU. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XT has performed better with a 8.75% return vs 0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CLOU.

XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.58%, compared with 0.00% for CLOU.

CLOU tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CLOU and 0.46% for XT.

XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLOU and XT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer