CLOU vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLOU is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. CLOU is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, CLOU returned -5.37% vs 3.94% for CSHP. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOU charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

CLOU vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a -4.95% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.83% return.

CLOU

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -5.99%
• YTD: -4.95%
• 6M: -5.99%
• 1Y: -5.37%
• 3Y*: 3.57%
• 5Y*: -5.18%
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 3.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOU vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF	-4.95%	-5.59%	18.44%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.83%	4.10%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOU and CSHP is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024	0.04

Return for Risk

CLOU vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOU

CLOU Risk / Return Rank: 7
CLOU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CLOU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
CLOU Omega Ratio Rank: 7
CLOU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CLOU Martin Ratio Rank: 7

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOU vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLOU	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	11.09	-11.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.05	27.60	-27.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	6.46	-5.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.20	65.45	-65.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.47	381.67	-382.14

CLOU vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOU Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOU and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLOU vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOU	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.74%	-0.08%	-53.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.24%	-0.06%	-27.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.93%	-0.04%	-31.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.43%	-0.00%	-24.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.46%	0.01%	+11.45%

Volatility

CLOU vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) has a higher volatility of 13.72% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.16%. This indicates that CLOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOU	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.72%	0.16%	+13.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.33%	0.27%	+25.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.89%	0.36%	+29.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.65%	0.41%	+30.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.76%	0.41%	+30.35%

CLOU vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOU vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

CLOU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.76%	0.00%	0.05%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.91%	5.39%	1.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOU and CSHP in my portfolio?

CLOU and CSHP have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLOU or CSHP?

CLOU has higher volatility (13.72%) compared to CSHP (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, CLOU or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.94% vs -5.37% for CLOU. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLOU or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.94% return vs -5.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOU or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CLOU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOU or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.00% for CLOU.

What is the main difference between CLOU and CSHP?

CLOU is categorized as Technology Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CLOU and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.09 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.